The Guardian points out that Iraq only needs to obtain fissile materials to be able to wage nuclear war. Still, liberal appeasers want to wait until Saddam has nuclear power, or worse uses it, before we step in and stop his weapons development.

I've said before that liberals should be willing to at least set a number of how many people have to be killed before the US is 'justified' in enforcing UN regulations that Saddam himself has signed. After all, a man that won 99% of the vote in the last election can't be all that bad.