Ravenwood - 09/24/02 01:40 PM
Reversing his previous position, Bloomberg and NYC have confirmed that their proposed smoking ban will be enforced in private clubs, and any place the has "employees." They insist that they have the right to control private property, and the legal behavior of individuals, in the name of helpless employees that have no choice but to be subjected to highly lethal cigarette emissions of pompous over bearing elites.
Will this ban also include private households that have "employees?" I wonder what Bloomberg is going to say to those "employees" when they are out looking for a job. The smoking ban is likely to have a significant impact on local restaurants and businesses, which will in turn mean job cuts and lower wages for those that work in that industry.
I also wonder how Bloomberg plans to fix the budget crisis, which he previously "fixed" by increasing cigarette taxes, because smokers seem to be running out of places to smoke.
Isn't it ironic that in a city which just underwent an epic tradegy that a ban on smoking is set to take effect. If Sept 11th didn't cause you to start smoking , the toxins left in the downtown area will have the same affect on you anyway. With the city's economy in colapse, dosen't anyone think that bloomberg's priorities aren't in order? How can a city council that dosen't even enter bars legislate their will upon others with no hearings or discourse? Why not make it a voluntary ban and let the 1/4 of the city who does smoke continue to enjoy it. Legislating morality or behavior is UN AMERICAN.
Posted by: Jim at December 30, 2002 3:59 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014