Ravenwood - 01/05/03 05:00 AM
Can someone explain just how the adjustments to these brackets is unfair? It looks to me that every bracket is planned on being cut. Obviously the dollar value of the smaller tax brackets is going to be less than the dollar value of those in the higher brackets. That is something that socialist democrats think is unfair. They would have you leave the top brackets the same and give that money to those in the lowest brackets. Of course, to do that you need to have 0% or lower brackets for the low income persons.
Tax Rates by 2001 Taxable Income*
* Taxable income is income less deductions and personal exemptions. **Rate schedule assumes tax plan is fully phased in. (src) |
Category: Essays
Comments (1) top link me
Were I single with an income between $27,050 and $65,550 - which, by coincidence, I am - I might look askance at getting only a 3-point drop (28 to 25) in my top marginal rate. However, since I (1) understand math and (2) used to work for H&R Block and therefore sort of understand brackets, I can figure out that at the $27,050 taxable-income level, my taxes go down $300 ($4058 to $3758) under the Bush proposal, a drop of 7.4 percent. It won't buy me a Lexus, but $300 is nothing to sneer at.
Meanwhile, someone making half this much - $13,525 - gets (yes!) $300. And in this case, it's a drop of 14.8 percent ($2028 to $1728).
Let's scale our original example up tenfold, to $270,500. The Bush plan gives this guy, by my calculations, a break of $10,019 ($85,340 to $75,321), around 11.7 percent. Still not Lexus material. And remember our poor fellow making 13.5k got almost a 15-percent cut. He's paying an effective rate of 12.8 percent, whereas our theoretical rich-ish guy is forking over 27.8.
(Corrections are welcomed, in the event that I've screwed up royally. And of course, we're talking taxable income here, after whatever deductions and exemptions and exclusions and such are subtracted.)
Posted by: CGHill at January 5, 2003 7:38 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014