The Law of Unintended Consequences


iconNew York City restaurant and bar owners are facing yet another problem with the new smoking ban. As if it wasn't bad enough that they have to police smokers, lest they be faced with stiff criminal fines or the prospect of losing their business license, but now it would appear that some patrons are excusing themselves to grab a smoke outside, and never coming back to pay the tab. CNN (via Reuters) thinks that people running out without paying is a riot, but I wouldn't imagine that too many proprietors are laughing. The smoking ban will prove to be an expensive proposition to business owners, and may even lead to some of them shutting their doors.

The anti-smoking debate boils down to a question of choice. Employees and customers had the freedom to go someplace else if the smoke bothered them. Rather than exercise that freedom, they simply nullified the property rights of others, and put thousands of jobs at risk. Owning a small business is hard enough, without having to be the smoke-nazi, as well as be on the lookout for crooks who 'drink and dash'. In the east coast land of liberals, however, nobody seems to care.



Comments (3)      top   link me

Comments

There are few things as repressive as a "liberal". If they don't like it, you shouldn't do it. The kicker is that they call Republicans/Libertarians fascist and irresponsible.

Posted by: Courtade at May 2, 2003 11:06 AM

I think you might get a kick out of this: http://parkwayreststop.blogspot.com/2003_04_13_parkwayreststop_archive.html#92610577

Posted by: Jim - Parkway Rest Stop at May 6, 2003 3:42 AM

I covered that story too.

Setting aside the fact that the law negates the rights of property owners and restricts the enjoyment of an otherwise legal product, there are huge problems with the enforcement aspect.

The law is written so that property owners are the one's punished for their customer's 'unlawful' behavior. That puts property owners and bar managers in the precarious position of enforcing the law. When a policeman enforces a city statute, he has a badge, a gun, and the support of the city's citizens backing him up. When a private citizen is put in the position of having to enforce the law (as is the case in the smoking ban), they just may be putting their life on the line.

Posted by: Ravenwood at May 6, 2003 8:14 AM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer