Ravenwood - 05/06/03 07:00 AM
The AP reports that Democrats are continuing to block the vote on the nomination of two minority candidates for federal judgeships. The GOP has now lost five votes on attempts to break a democratic filibuster for Miguel Estrada. Republicans also lost a vote to break the filibuster for Priscilla Owen.
While I expected as much from sleazy Daschle democrats, the Republican lack of response to the filibusters is what really has me steamed. They never should have let the Estrada filibuster get this far, and should go back to the old rules of filibustering. A filibuster is supposed to be maintained by the filibustering party. The Dems should be required to take the floor and hold it until the filibuster is over. They should also not proceed with any other Senate business until the filibusters are resolved. Perhaps then the American people get the full picture of just how much the Democrats are obstructing.
I'm also upset that the media isn't focusing more on the democrats attempt to hijack the Constitutional process. You could have given them the benefit of the doubt as to their motives, up until Chuck Schumer suggested the President give up his Constitutional authority to the Senate. Schumer's suggestion that the only way to break the gridlock would be to allow the Senate to make the nominations, is a clear sign of a broader agenda. The democrats are holding the process hostage, and their goal is to negate the Constitution without an Amendment, and without ratification from the States.
This fits perfectly into their view that the Constitution is just some rag written by a bunch of racist white guys over 200 years ago.
More proof that the rule of law has no place in Democratic Party politics. At the same time it is up to Republicans to get the word out as to what is happening. Force the obstructionists to state why they are against the nominee, give them the rope with which to hang themselves.
Posted by: Courtade at May 6, 2003 9:50 AMWell now, if true partisian politics were to take over, some serious veto power and/or Supreme Court reviewing would be done in response....
you see, the President and the Republicans have the right to employ checks-and-balances against the Demo (non-)agenda as well....
The filibuster is actually a checks-and-balances power of the minority to attempt to suppress something that the majority would otherwise be in favor of.... the real trick is to have a real heavyweight employ it....
I'm not sure what you mean by this:
"The Dems should be required to take the floor and hold it until the filibuster is over."
aren't they??? I can't find any info on a change of filibuster rules..... do you know something I don't?
Posted by: Jim S at May 6, 2003 2:57 PMJim,
No, they aren't. Currently filibustering has been reduced to a mere formality. The filibustering party announces the filibuster which kicks it into super-majority status. They sometimes take a vote to break the filibuster, and if less than 60 votes are cast in favor of it, they simply move on to other Senate business.
Nobody actually stands up and filibusters anymore.
Posted by: Ravenwood at May 6, 2003 3:43 PMI think it just goes to show which party is REALLY the party of racists and sexists. The Dems are blocking Miguel Estrada simply because he's Hispanic and Priscilla Owen because she's female. That's the story that needs to be told.
Posted by: Ralph Gizzip at May 6, 2003 9:33 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014