Ravenwood - 05/09/03 01:00 PM
I don't really understand why Michele hates Ted Rall so much. I've read a few of his op-eds, and figure that fisking Ted Rall would be a huge waste of time. Any sane person the read's Rall isn't going to get two sentences without rolling their eyes. Anyone that actually believes Rall probably doesn't have the capacity for rational thinking any way. Trying to refute the Tedrallians with logic and thought is a bit like trying to teach nuclear physics to an orangutan. You can use charts, graphs, and logic, but they just aren't listening. Those that would listen, just don't get it. Perhaps it's more like arguing with your refrigerator.
As for Ted's columns, I've found that they all seem to follow the same formula.
UPDATE: I missed this earlier, but Fox News already covered Ted Rall. "Typing Monkeys Don't Quite Write 'Hamlet': Monkeys given computer to type on, but end up using keyboard mainly as toilet"
Those monkeys may not write "Hamlet" but I'll bet they could write a better column than Ted Rall.
Posted by: Ralph Gizzip at May 9, 2003 7:49 PMYou know you're an idiot when even a good, card-carrying Liberal like myself thinks your work is best used as toilet paper. Rall simply doesn't have anything useful to say, so he attracts attention with bombast and vitriol, much like Ann Coulter. Say, they're both single, aren't they???
Posted by: Jack Cluth at May 9, 2003 8:33 PMTed Rall could be used in an introduction to fisking class. If one cannot fisk every single sentence (and that's what happened in the one and only Rall column I ever fisked - hey! I was drunk and didn't have anything to write about that night), one should not consider fisking as a blog option. Had there been no Robert Fisk, the term would have probably been called Ralling.
Posted by: Denny Wilson at May 9, 2003 9:40 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014