Constitutional Amendment of the Day


iconToday's Constitutional Amendment of the Day is Amendment IX. "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Since I have been taking some expected abuse over at the Command Post for my criticism of the Allied gun grab in Iraq, I'm reviving this category, to pay homage to this often overlooked member of our Bill of Rights. I am not surprised that pundits have resorted to name calling and abuse, calling my views "extremist", and suggesting I have a "militia" like attitude. I can only assume that this is just short of playing the "race card", and likening me to the "Militias" formed by 1980s white supremacists. Still, I shrug all that off.

Most notable though, is the common feeling that Iraqis are living in a war zone, and thus have no right to bear arms. The feeling is that the safety of our troops is paramount, and that taking guns away from Iraqi citizens is just good "common sense." I've also been criticized for holding the belief that all humans, not just Americans, have a right to defend themselves. The feeling is that Americans have the right to liberty and self-defense, because our Constitution gives us that right. Since Iraqis are not bound, nor protected, by the U.S. Constitution, they have no such rights.

While I have the utmost concern for our men and women in harms way, it is still my firm belief, that the right to defend yourself is not something that is granted, or written down. It is inherent and absolute. A law of nature, or if you will, a right granted by God.

If you look at nature, creatures all over the planet exercise their defensive instinct. If you go to pick up a snake or a rat or anything else, and it bites you, do you blame the thing for biting you? Do you say that it had no right to defend itself? Do you ask what government or societal entity granted that creature the right to defend itself? Why should humans be any different?

A person has a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. While that may be a right that we "protect" here in the United States, it is NOT a right granted by government. The founders of this nation recognized that those rights were inherent to all men. So much so, that the Amendment IX was included in the Bill of Rights to say that the "enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Samuel Adams noted that:

Among the Natural Rights of the Colonists are these First. a Right to Life; Secondly to Liberty; thirdly to Property; together with the Right to support and defend them in the best manner they can--Those are evident Branches of, rather than deductions from the Duty of Self Preservation, commonly called the first Law of Nature--

The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man; but only to have the law of nature for his rule.--

And that, my friends, is why I contend that every being has a natural right to self defense and liberty. They have and should defend those rights the best way that they can. That is also why I feel that no governmental body can take away those rights, nor should they try.


Category:  Amendment of the Day
Comments (3)      top   link me

Comments

I LOVE YOU, MAN!

I'm currently debating an Irishman living in London over the Second Amendment. We've each quoted an Adams or two, and the quote you have here WILL BE USED.

He exhibits exactly the attitude you describe, and I'm trying to get him to see the error of his ways.

Thanks, I needed that.

Posted by: Kevin Baker at May 22, 2003 1:58 PM

Well said. Even defenders of the 2nd make the mistake of saying that the purpose of the FF was not for self-defense against a government, but rather only for hunting. These men had just fought and won freedom, successfully, because they were armed; they wanted to ensure that people in the future (our present?) could do the same in the face of tyranny.

Posted by: Michael at May 22, 2003 3:45 PM

I am familiar with the debate with the Irishman living in England, because a lot of it happened on my blog. I also know that he does not comprehend the idea of "rights" as something not granted by government. Our Founders realized that you are BORN with rights. The only thing government can do is take those rights away. That's what the Bill of Rights was supposed to prevent.

We're losing that idea today, because more and more people believe that government "grants" rights to the people. Bullshit. I will live my life as a free man because that is my RIGHT, and if government tries to take that away from me, I will lie to my government. I will cheat.

But I will live free, or die.

Posted by: Acidman at May 22, 2003 10:24 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer