Ravenwood - 09/05/03 06:00 AM
World Net Daily takes a look at whether or not Michael Moore even met the Academy entry requirements for his "documentary" film Bowling for Columbine. Aside from the controversy surrounding Moore's staged performances and scripted scenes (in a "documentary"), Moore may not have even met the basic entry requirements for documentary films. The Academy requires that documentary films run for at least seven days in Manhattan or Los Angeles County, and that the film be advertised during the entire run in a major newspaper. Moore seems to have failed that requirement.
In previous years, entries were required to have proof, however for 2002 the rules were changed and proof was not required. WND also notes that Moore's scripting and staging of scenes also violates Academy rules for documentaries. That rule has largely been ignored, much to the chagrin of competing documentarians.
Dan Gifford, an Academy Award nominee himself, has called on the academy to investigate whether Moore "fabricated scenes and video of real people that has been edited to manufacture a fictional reality intended to mislead viewers."Gifford's complaints seem to have fallen on deaf ears. In typical leftist fashion, the ends seem to justify the means. The Hollywood elite seem to be overlooking the lies and deceit, because they largely agree with Moore's wacky claims.If it is determined those accusations are true, Gifford, the producer of "Waco: The Rules of Engagement," wrote to Bruce Davis, executive director of the academy, Moore should be stripped of the Oscar and it should be awarded to the runner-up.
Category: Left-wing Conspiracy
Comments (2) top link me
What scripted scences I notice you dont bring up one example, not a single one huh, pretty strong claim then I see. The hollywood elite who are they, and attacking a documentary for not running a certain number of ads, man this movie must have hit a button with you cause everysingle one of his facts and interviews can be thourouly checked out and backed up as original and unscripted. You should do your research before making such claims. www.michaelmoore.com or www.census.org has a lot of the info.
Posted by: Kevin C. Mulhall at October 28, 2003 1:34 PMActually, I've already discussed the Michael Moore lies on this site. I didn't feel the need to repeat myself. However, if you are so interested, feel free to read this, which is based on David T. Hardy's analysis. Hardy does a good job of debunking Moore's phony claims, and yes some of the scenes were staged. (Or did you think that Charlton Heston had the magical ability to change clothes while giving that speech?)
Posted by: Ravenwood at October 28, 2003 2:09 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014