Did Michael Moore deceive the Academy?


iconWorld Net Daily takes a look at whether or not Michael Moore even met the Academy entry requirements for his "documentary" film Bowling for Columbine. Aside from the controversy surrounding Moore's staged performances and scripted scenes (in a "documentary"), Moore may not have even met the basic entry requirements for documentary films. The Academy requires that documentary films run for at least seven days in Manhattan or Los Angeles County, and that the film be advertised during the entire run in a major newspaper. Moore seems to have failed that requirement.

In previous years, entries were required to have proof, however for 2002 the rules were changed and proof was not required. WND also notes that Moore's scripting and staging of scenes also violates Academy rules for documentaries. That rule has largely been ignored, much to the chagrin of competing documentarians.

Dan Gifford, an Academy Award nominee himself, has called on the academy to investigate whether Moore "fabricated scenes and video of real people that has been edited to manufacture a fictional reality intended to mislead viewers."

If it is determined those accusations are true, Gifford, the producer of "Waco: The Rules of Engagement," wrote to Bruce Davis, executive director of the academy, Moore should be stripped of the Oscar and it should be awarded to the runner-up.

Gifford's complaints seem to have fallen on deaf ears. In typical leftist fashion, the ends seem to justify the means. The Hollywood elite seem to be overlooking the lies and deceit, because they largely agree with Moore's wacky claims.


Category:  Left-wing Conspiracy
Comments (2)      top   link me

Comments

What scripted scences I notice you dont bring up one example, not a single one huh, pretty strong claim then I see. The hollywood elite who are they, and attacking a documentary for not running a certain number of ads, man this movie must have hit a button with you cause everysingle one of his facts and interviews can be thourouly checked out and backed up as original and unscripted. You should do your research before making such claims. www.michaelmoore.com or www.census.org has a lot of the info.

Posted by: Kevin C. Mulhall at October 28, 2003 1:34 PM

Actually, I've already discussed the Michael Moore lies on this site. I didn't feel the need to repeat myself. However, if you are so interested, feel free to read this, which is based on David T. Hardy's analysis. Hardy does a good job of debunking Moore's phony claims, and yes some of the scenes were staged. (Or did you think that Charlton Heston had the magical ability to change clothes while giving that speech?)

Posted by: Ravenwood at October 28, 2003 2:09 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometer