"Living Wage" is killing non-profits


iconApparently Berkeley's "living wage" laws that are designed to help the "working poor" are killing off the non-profits. Owen notes that some non-profits are unable to comply because they don't have the funds to boost minimum wages up to the $10.76 per hour that the law requires.

Conservative economists have long known that minimum wages actually take jobs away from the very people they are supposed to help. Dr. Williams covered this years ago.

...Let's go back several decades and pretend you produced automatic dishwashing machines. Your salesmen put on a sales pitch, but restaurant owners say: "Why should we buy your costly machines when we can hire people to wash dishes for $2.00 per hour? It isn't worth it." You would benefit from Congress raising the minimum wage to say $4.00 per hour. Why? It raises the cost of restaurant owners using people to wash dishes. Thus, they'd have greater financial incentive to buy dishwashing machines from you.
[...]

The real problem for low-skilled workers is not that they're underpaid, but that they're underproductive. The solution is to improve their skills and education. One of the ways to do this is to have a climate where youngsters can have early work experiences. The little bit of money a youngster can earn after school and weekends is nice but not nearly as beneficial as the lessons learned, such as: proper work attitudes, promptness, and respect for supervisors.

In short, the pay should match what the market will bear. If you pay your neighbor kid $20 to mow your lawn, the benefit is mutual, or you wouldn't do it. To you, you'd rather pay $20 for the chance to lounge around inside and watch football while your lawn gets mowed, and the neighbor kid would rather give up a few hours to get your $20 so he can take his sweetheart out this weekend. If the government came along and told you that you had to pay a "living wage" of $50 to mow your lawn, you probably wouldn't hire the neighborhood. For $50 you could hire a professional lawn service, and get someone that shows up on time, does the edging, and blows off the sidewalks after he's done. All the "living wage" has done is put the neighbor kid out of work.

The same premise holds true for so-called, sweatshops.



Comments (1)      top   link me

Comments

Yep - big big debate about all this stuff on a website of my former boss (he was advocating it, and I was smacking it down). Led to me reading the book about which the debate started - Nickled and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. I did two reviews of it - first half and then the second half/book as a whole.

If you're interested, they're in the archive, but a search on dimed would probably find them quite quickly.

hln

Posted by: hln at October 29, 2003 9:41 AM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer