And now a word from our sponsors


iconThe Washington Post continues their anti-smoking agenda. Take a look at the first two lines of this "news" story.

Martha S. Jones has asthma, so whenever her husband, Bob, lights up at their Woodbridge home, the agreement is that he steps outside.

She used to think that protected her from exposure to the more than 4,000 chemical compounds found in cigarette smoke, 43 of which are known to cause cancer in humans or animals.

Gee, plagiarize anti-smoking literature much? Or do the tobacco wackos just mail in their propaganda so that the Post can publish it as "news". What's worse, is that they go on to tout some second hand smoke pee test device.
The manufacturer, Nymox Corp. of Maywood, N.J., says the $15 test can be used to measure the secondhand smoke exposure of employees in smoky workplaces and people who live with smokers. One expert says it could be used in child custody cases.
Great, scientific legal testimony that costs $15 and fits into your pocket. How many lawsuits and bogus nanny laws is this little device going to spawn? They way they hawk it, I wonder if the Post owns stock in the damned thing. They stopped short of saying "call now, while supplies last". Oh, wait. Here it is on page two.
It is being sold by Drugstore.com and CVS.com...
The Post goes on to claim, "Secondhand smoke is well established by scientists as a cause of disease in nonsmokers." 'Well established' in the same way that 'global warming' is a scientific fact. Nowhere in their sales pitch did they mention that despite the best efforts of the CDC and WHO, scientists have been unable to find a conclusive link between second hand smoke and cancer.


Category:  Blaming the Media
Comments (2)      top   link me

Comments

There's a scientific link between anything and anything else. All it takes is enough scientists. If you want 99% confidence, it takes 100 scientists. 99.9% takes 1000. It's not rocket science.

Posted by: Ron Hardin at January 20, 2004 7:52 AM

Now, just how does having a test make it more convincing that it does harm? A sundial tests whether the sun is shining, does that mean the sun is a bad thing?

"She used to think that protected her from exposure to the more than 4,000 chemical compounds found in cigarette smoke, 43 of which are known to cause cancer in humans or animals."

Can't the same be said of, say, potatoes? In fact, potato greens are deadly poison! Ban potatoes! For many years, people believed tomatoes were poisonous. Breathing a pure oxygen atmosphere will kill you. Drinking too much water kills, even if you don't inhale it.

Now, quoting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention seems to lend it weight - but even they admit there is no proof at all, just "well, the parents smoke, and the kid died" evidence. Wonder if the parents drank water? Did their exhalations saturate the air?

Posted by: offut at January 21, 2004 8:25 AM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer