For some in Missouri, no permits yet


iconMissouri gun owners won in the State Supreme Court, but are still losing at home. The Missouri Supreme Court correctly ruled that the state constitution did not explicitly deny citizens the right to carry concealed firearms, it merely didn't automatically provide for it.

The court wrote: "There is no constitutional prohibition against the wearing of concealed weapons; there is only a prohibition against invoking the right to keep and bear arms to justify the wearing of concealed weapons." A contrary decision would have made it illegal for even police officers to carry concealed guns.
That's right, gun grabbers were even trying to take guns away from police officers, something that I noted last year. But now that gun owners in Missouri have won in the supreme court, they'll get to carry guns, right? Well, not everyone.

The court apparently left the funding issue a little ambiguous. Gun grabbers consider the concealed carry permit process to be an unfunded mandate that cannot be paid with fees collected locally. In their mind, law abiding Missourians shouldn't simply be able to pay the processing fees and pick up a permit like in other states. It would be a hoot if the legislature responded by passing a "Vermont-style" unregulated carry bill, but that seems unrealistic. Especially given the attitudes of the local officials and gun banners in the state.

Gun grabber and St. Louis attorney, Burton Newman is threatening legal action against anyone who even thinks of trying to get a permit. "Any county in the state of Missouri that attempts to implement the conceal and carry law will be challenged in the Missouri courts," said Newman. Presumably that means he'll sue St. Francois County Sheriff Dan Bullock.

Meanwhile local law enforcement aren't exactly jumping to issue permits. "Some law enforcement officials are saying that even if permits are issued, they will arrest anyone possessing a concealed weapon within their jurisdiction," Sheriff Gary Toelke siad.

"The sheriff's department will be on hold as it relates to issuing the permits until the pending options and opinions have been discussed thoroughly. We will do our best to keep Franklin County residents informed on the status of the case." Toelke said. "Those citizens who purchased the permits would lose the $100 fee for the permit."

Missouri is almost there, but the fight seems far from over.



Comments (1)      top   link me

Comments

It looks as if Missouri is trying to make their law read "May issue" instead of "Shall issue". "May issue" means the sheriff can tell you, "The law says I got to issue a permit to you at my discrescion (sp?). And I don't feel like it."

Posted by: Ralph Gizzip at March 1, 2004 10:22 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer