Ravenwood - 04/22/04 06:30 AM
When Georgia's Gwinnett County repealed property rights by passing a restrictive county-wide smoking ban, Wild Bill's was banking on getting an exemption. But when it came to a vote, the County turned them down on the grounds that it wouldn't be fair to other businesses who don't get an exemption. (Kinda nullifies the definition of exemption, doesn't it?)
Dunn, the swing vote on a split commission, voted with Commissioners Kevin Kenerly and Marcia Neaton last week to delay a decision on the exemption, saying he wanted to refine it to limit the exemption to Wild Bill's, a 50,000-square-foot megaclub.The county insisted that they install a $1 Million ventalation system to qualify for an exemption. After the system was installed, they voted against them any way.
But at Tuesday's commission meeting, Dunn surprised observers by voting with Commissioner Bert Nasuti and Chairman Wayne Hill to reject the exemption for Wild Bill's. [...]Wild Bill's sought an exemption from the smoking ban because it installed a $1 million ventilation system at the county's insistence to remove secondhand smoke, only to have the commission ban smoking in unincorporated Gwinnett on April 1.
Whenever these smoking bans are proposed, lawmakers always claim it's in the business owners best interest. They claim that business actually increases, because the poor downtrodden non-smokers don't have any smoke free places to go. If that's true, why do you suppose a club would shell out a million bucks to try to get an exemption?
Category: Pleasure Police
Comments (5) top link me
Thats why I love your blog! What other site has the scoop on my home county elite rulers?
Posted by: Kingslasher in Gwinnett at April 22, 2004 6:45 AMSounds like a clear-cut case of fraud to me. Wild Bill's should investigate if his HVAC contractor has any ties to the county commissioners.
At the least he should file suit in the state court.
Posted by: Ralph Gizzip at April 22, 2004 7:36 AMCan we shoot them now?
Posted by: Kevin Baker at April 22, 2004 9:01 AMYou'd bloody better!
Posted by: Dave The Australian at April 22, 2004 10:44 PMI think you are misreading the article - to me, it sounds like Bill's installed the super-ventilation system before they passed the ban.
Regardless, it's an intolerable invasion of private property rights. 30 years ago, a highly smoke sensitive person such as myself would have a hard time finding anywhere to go out. Not anymore. And the commission's obvious intention is not to ensure that nonsmokers have someplace to go, but to ensure that smokers have nowhere to go.
Posted by: markm at April 25, 2004 9:30 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014