Illinois Gov threatens 'wholesale vetoes'


iconSome "pro-gun" bills are making their way through the Chicago legislature, and that has Illinois Governor and gun fearing wussy Rod Blagojevich quaking in his boots.

Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Thursday promised "wholesale vetoes" of several pieces of pro-gun legislation if lawmakers do not pass an assault weapons ban, underscoring the governor's tough new gun-control attitude.

Reacting to Thursday's House passage of a pro-gun measure he had already promised to veto, Blagojevich signaled he is losing patience over lawmakers' refusal to pass some of the gun control measures he supports while they advance a gun-friendly agenda.

The "gun-friendly agenda" that has the Illinois governor so scared, is actually not very gun-friendly at all. In fact it's more of a pro-self defense legislation.
The gun legislation passed in the House was inspired by a Wilmette man who shot an intruder in his home, then was charged with violating the city's gun ban. The legislation would allow someone to use self-defense as a legal argument in court.

The bill passed 90-25 after an amendment was added to make certain that the self-defense argument could be used only if people shoot an intruder at their home or office, supporters said.

"I was shocked at the number of votes that proposal received in the House," Blagojevich said. "So I would say get your work done, send it to us, and I'll veto it right away."

Illinois' governor is so rabidly anti-gun that he's willing to sacrifice a homeowner's right to defend themself from attack in order to advance his own personal agenda. (An agenda that the Illinois House and Senate don't seem to be interested in.)


Category:  Cold Dead Hands
Comments (3)      top   link me

Comments

I'll be in Illinois tomorrow. I'll be sure to sneer in Springfield's direction.

If you don't visit often, Aaron at Free Will Blog (http://www.freewillblog.com) is constantly picking at his governor. It's quite amusing.

hln

Posted by: hln at May 15, 2004 8:16 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if a piece of legeslation passes by more than a 2/3 margin then it's veto-proof, right? What difference does it make if the gov. votes it and the legislature passes it by more than 66% and makes it law anyway A 90-25 vote is far more than 66%, closer to 80%...

Posted by: Aaron at May 16, 2004 12:29 PM

That is just the House vote. The Senate vote could have been much closer. The article didn't bother to check and see what the Senate vote was/would be, but then again, neither did I.

Posted by: Ravenwood at May 16, 2004 12:53 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer