Ravenwood - 08/18/04 06:30 AM
The Governor of Illinois announced plans to set up a prescription drug program that will violate federal law by importing drugs from other countries and bypassing FDA testing and approval. I've already covered the dangers of importing prescription drugs, noting that:
Buying medicines from Canada may sound reasonably safe, but how would you feel if you knew your drugs were coming into Canada from Bangladesh, Brazil, or Iran. Canadian imports from those countries has increased dramatically, and it's mostly being fueled by U.S. demand. These and other countries like China and the Philippines are known to counterfeit drugs, and all of them are increasing shipments to Canada.These shipments are processed through drug clearinghouses and usually go uninspected. It is precisely these clearinghouses that Illinois plans to use:
The state won't import the drugs itself, but it plans to contract with a Canadian company to connect Illinois residents with a network of foreign pharmacies that have been approved by state health inspectors. [...]The Governor estimates that savings would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $91 Million to $1.9
The clearinghouse Blagojevich proposed Tuesday would be an "aggressive expansion" of the governor's previous push to import drugs from Canada only, and the drugs it would allow access to would be illegal and unregulated by U.S. agencies, said William Hubbard, FDA associate commissioner for policy and planning.
Of course, what Gov. Blagojevich doesn't say is that Illinois is opening themselves up to untold Billions of dollars in liability if some bad drugs get through. I have a feeling that trial lawyers (like John Edwards) will be chomping at the bit to represent anyone with negative side affects from illegally imported drugs.
If you think I'm overstating the potential for danger, keep this in mind. The Galen Institute reports that:
When asked about the potential impact of U.S. pharmacies limiting shipments to Canadian pharmacies, a Canadian pharmacy owner and non-pharmacist told surveyors for the Minnesota Board of Pharmacy, "We won't have any problem getting drugs. We have creative ways to get them."Does that sound like someone from whom you want to buy your meds?
Of course all these medicines are sold with liability disclaimers. The foreign e-pharmacies disclaim all liability if you get sick or die from their medicines. Likewise, states that encourage folks to buy drugs from Canada also try to disclaim legal liability. Of course, they can't exactly do that. By promoting behavior that is illegal, the state and local governments are setting up a hazardous condition. Because of the inherent negligence, the state has no protection from liability when someone is injured as a result. State laws vary, but most courts have agreed that negligence offers no liability protection, no matter how many disclaimers people sign.
The bottom line is that public officials need to tread lightly on the subject of drug re-importation. Not only are they breaking federal law, but they are setting themselves up for potential lawsuits. The short term savings just aren't worth the risk. In the long term, it could end up costing much more than it saves.
(Editor's Note: I feel it necessary to point out that I do hold stock in a major pharmaceutical company. I don't think that has biased my opinion, and I stand by the facts I have presented here. But I still think that I should at least let you know.)
Well, hastening the death of sick people is one way to reduce healthcare costs.
Wouldn't be my first choice, though.
It's really funny. Here the Dums want to reduce healthcare costs by allowing drugs produced overseas to come into the U.S. but they wail about the loss of American jobs to overseas operations.
Posted by: Ralph Gizzip at August 18, 2004 7:54 AMRegarding the Editors note:
I don't think that your six month supply of Viagra and Rogaine count as "holding stock in a major pharmaceutical company."
/smartass
Posted by: Nick Bourbaki at August 18, 2004 9:31 AMYou know, if I ran a major drug company, and Illinois goes through with this, I'd simply stop sellingn my products in the state. And I'd threaten to cut off any distributors that imported them into the state from other states.
If Pfizer alone did this, Blago-bitch would retreat so fast people would think he was the French army. Can you imagine how pissed the old man voters would get if their Viagra supply is cut off?
Posted by: Heartless Libertarian at August 18, 2004 1:16 PMThe whole prescription thing is a major mess. People want cheap medicine, they also want totally safe medicine. The only way to prove safety is time and testing. Both of these cost a tremendous amount. If a drug is pushed thru and someone does get sick or die from it, the first thing that happens is a lawsuit (from John Edwards ilk) against everybody who has any cash and was part of the process.
People want drugs from Canada, which may or may not have been produced in a safe way with accurate dosing. They will also be looking for an attorney if anything goes wrong. You cannot have it both ways, quality and safety cost money.
Why do I see a burgening opportunity in home drug testing kits? Capitalism baby, its more than just a name.
dzimmerm
Posted by: dzimmerm at August 23, 2004 1:29 AM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014