A Picture of Global Warming


iconGee, who do you suppose they are trying to blame with this photograph of global warming? (It looks to me like Canada is to blame!)

globalwarming.jpg

The chicken littles warn:

Global warming is approaching the critical point of no return, after which widespread drought, crop failure and rising sea-levels would be irreversible, an international climate change task force warned Monday.

The report, "Meeting the Climate Challenge," called on the G-8 leading industrial nations to cut carbon emissions, double their research spending on green technology and work with India and China to build on the Kyoto Protocol.

Tell that to Tony Grieco of Somerville, Mass, who is digging out his car from under 5 feet of snow.

In a related note, Steven Milloy notes that the U.N.'s World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction is trying to push the agenda that there are no "Natural" disasters any more.

As the global warming alarmist community likes to point out, the U.S. is the largest single contributor to the alleged global warming, emitting 25 percent of all greenhouse gases while possessing only 4 percent of the world's population.

Toward the goal of blaming the U.S. for what used to be considered "natural disasters" in order to eventually extract financial compensation, the U.N. conference's draft action plan is riddled with references to climate change [read, "U.S.-made climate change"] as causing or contributing to "disasters."

The Bush administration rightly opposes the U.N.'s effort to de-naturalize disasters and has requested that the document's references to climate change be removed. But U.N. officials oppose such changes.

"I hope there will be a global recognition of climate change causing more natural disasters," said Jan Egeland, U.N. undersecretary-general for humanitarian affairs.

Weather disasters like hurricanes, floods, droughts, heat waves, cold snaps, ice storms always have, and always will plague man. As far as we know, they are entirely natural occurrences. There is absolutely no credible evidence that humans - much less Americans in particular - have had have any discernible impact on the frequency and severity of - dare I say it? - natural disasters.

By changing the movement from 'global warming' to 'climate change', they have made it impossible to refute their claims. If it gets hotter, it must be 'global warming'. If we have a blizzard, it must be extreme weather due to 'climate change'. We used to call it weather, but now if it's not 72 and sunny, the environmental wackos claim the end is near.



Comments (4)      top   link me

Comments

Hmmm.....
It looks to me like those pesky Inuit are to blame. All that seal oil in the lamps, and gas from sled dogs no doubt.

Posted by: robert in england at January 25, 2005 7:20 AM

All that hot air from the U.N. must play into this phenomena as well.

Posted by: Steve Scudder at January 25, 2005 8:29 AM

Actually, slightly warmer winter weather can lead to increased snowfall. It certainly does around here (Michigan 200 miles north of Detroit). When it's really cold (sub-zero), there's little or no snow because the air won't hold enough moisture to make much. When it's around +20F, we often get buried.

Winters do seem to have become significantly warmer since I was a kid (30-40 years ago). I remember many winters with 6 weeks of unbroken subzero weather from late January into early March. Now it still hits the - extremes, but only for a week or so at a time, and every few weeks it warms up enough to rain, even in February. Not that this proves global warming - maybe we're just recovering from a cold cycle that peaked in the early 70's, and certainly Greenland is still much colder now than it was 1,000 years ago.

But it doesn't snow that much more, I'd rather shovel a foot of snow at 20F than 3 inches at -10F, and snow removal is cheaper than heating bills, so I'm not complaining. And those periods with 30-something temperatures and rain melt the snow piles down so we don't run out of places to put it.

Posted by: markm at January 25, 2005 2:18 PM

Wht the global warming proponents fail to take into acount is that solar activity has been steadily increasing since the '60's. Now I don't know about you but when I was in school we learned that the Sun was responsible for heating this big blue marble. Doesn't it logically follow that more solar activity equals higher temperatures? I also seem to remember these same environmentalists squawking about the coming Ice Age back in the '60's and early '70's. Make up your minds, folks. Which is it?

Posted by: Ralph Gizzip at January 25, 2005 9:31 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer