Ravenwood - 02/23/05 08:00 AM
It would appear that some people are upset at black immigrants horning in on the racial preferences racket. Courtesy of the New York Times: (emphasis mine)
"African-born and Caribbean-born brothers and sisters have realized that the police don't discriminate on the basis of nationality--ask Amadou Diallo [an immigrant from Guinea who was accidentally shot by police in 1999]," said Professor Charles J. Ogletree Jr., who teaches at Harvard Law School and has warned colleges and universities that admitting mostly foreign-born blacks to meet the goals of affirmative action is insufficient.Notes James Taranto, "In other words, in the name of "affirmative action," he is calling for discrimination against black people who were born outside the U.S."Whether you are from Brazil or from Cuba, you are still products of slavery," he continued. "But the threshold is that people of African descent who were born and raised and suffered in America have to be the first among equals."
The trouble with this is that the argument the Supreme Court has used to justify racial preferences in university admissions is "diversity." Favoring someone from the Bronx over an African-American from Burkina Faso is hardly a way to achieve that goal."
Your title was my first thought, too.
Posted by: Brian J. at February 23, 2005 8:08 AMJust look at the history of the civil rights movement. It started with the goal of making all people equal, then it mutated into a bizarre "Animal Farm" situation, where some people were more equal than others. I believe that "diversity" is a dirty word today, one used to justify deplorable, discriminatory behavior.
That's what you get when government sets out to make things "fair."
Posted by: Acidman at February 23, 2005 12:28 PMI guess the next step in affirmitive action is to have color cards (like paint samples), so it can be judged how black the person is on a numbered scale......
Posted by: Robert Garrard at February 23, 2005 5:34 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014