Ravenwood - 03/01/05 07:30 AM
Neal wants to know how long it will take for the easily offended to be outraged over the new buffalo nickels. They appear to be somewhat um... anatomically correct.
Is that a...OHMIGAWD!!!! Can buffalo porn be far behind??
Posted by: Jack Cluth at March 1, 2005 9:14 AM"Five-cent Mary", it is not.
Posted by: Steve Scudder at March 1, 2005 10:26 AMI would have expected this from the Clinton nickel, but thought better of the noble buffalo. Is it descrimination if there are no versions with female buffalo?
Posted by: Michael at March 1, 2005 1:07 PMIf anyone complains around me, I'll just tell them to either lighten up, or kiss my anatomically correct ass........
Posted by: Robert Garrard at March 1, 2005 1:08 PMI'm pretty sure that HORRIBLE THING is called a pizzle.
Maybe the model for the coin just had a really long tail that sorta got twisted around.
Posted by: kjo at March 1, 2005 3:30 PMThe Vermont quarter has a guy peeing on a tree.
Posted by: Ron Hardin at March 1, 2005 3:42 PMIs there room to park a bust of Supreme Court Justice Here's-What-the-Europeans-Think-Our-Constitution-Should-Say Kennedy under the buffalo?
Posted by: Axel Kassel at March 2, 2005 5:21 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014