Ravenwood - 04/18/05 06:30 AM
Hollywood celebrities are used to getting things for free. But some celebs live their daily lives completely on the tabs of others, reports the New York Post.
WE all know celebrities get free stuff - swag - just for being famous. But did you know that there are some stars who eat, fly, sleep, party, do virtually everything in their day-to-day life for free? All they do is demand it, take it, or simply walk out on the tab. The Hollywood "gimme!" syndrome has run amuck.They go on to detail how stars like Britney Spears, Sharon Stone, Andy Dick and others try to con people out of free stuff or just walk out without paying. Many companies give up the stuff willingly in exchange for publicity, while others are forced to chase them down for payment or return.
[Rachel] Hunter, says one event publicist, never met a gift bag she didn't like. In fact, she likes them so much she often takes four or five at a time.Entertainment Weekly has more. They say that the cost of perks is about 5% of a studio's film budget. So for a $100 Million movie, about $5 Million of that is just for perks.She's so determined that, a few years ago, at a Maxim Magazine party in Los Angeles, she left the party but came back to collect a few more bags.
Unluckily for her, the police had shut down the event due to overcrowding and were attempting to clear the area. Hunter gamely ignored them, until finally a policeman was forced to yell over a megaphone: "Ma'am! Step away from the goodie bags!"
Every time you accede to a star's demands, you need to take money from somewhere else. One action star, for example, requires a basketball court wherever he's shooting, even if it means spending $35,000 to build one. Such extravagance, says one production executive, inevitably comes out of someone else's paycheck: "People who work below the line get squeezed: the director of photography, the editor."All of this self-aggrandizement certainly explains why some celebrities flock to entitlement politics.Ultimately, of course, anything that drives up the cost of any entertainment product eventually trickles down to the audience. "The consumer ends up paying for it," one studio chief says flatly. If the 5 percent estimate is roughly accurate across the entertainment industry, when you fork over $10 for a movie ticket or $18 for a CD, bear in mind that anywhere from 50 cents to a dollar of your hard-earned cash may be going to pay for a star's dog to fly first-class. Fido thanks you.
But studios are fighting back. Following the dot-com bust of 2000, bottom lines are a lot leaner. With shrinking profitability, many studios are now balking at celebrities outlandish demands, and enduring the resulting temper tantrum.
Category: Celebrities Unscripted
Comments (4) top link me
"All of this self-aggrandizement certainly explains why some celebrities flock to entitlement politics."
LOL.. very nice.
I saw this story on Fox News over the weekend. The funniest I thought was Brittany Spears wanting free coffee at Starbucks just because she is who she is.
Posted by: Publius II at April 18, 2005 10:23 AM"All of this self-aggrandizement certainly explains why some celebrities flock to entitlement politics."
Uh...no...though it might fit your "liberals are clueless dorks theme", stupid, spoiled people do the stupid things they are allowed to get away with- regardless of which side of the plate they happen to swing from.
I agree; fabulously wealthy and famous people demanding handouts because...well, because they can...is the height of absurdity. To equate to Liberal politics is both arrogant AND absurd.
Stupid knows no affiliation.
Posted by: Jack Cluth at April 18, 2005 2:57 PMGee Jack,
I never once used the term 'liberal'. You must have read 'entitlement' and immediately thought 'liberal'. I wonder why that is.
Posted by: Ravenwood at April 18, 2005 3:49 PMRavenwood: Maybe because we all know that entitlement is what the so-called liberalism of the present is all about.
But it isn't just a liberal disease. 20-some years ago when I lived in Oklahoma, there was a state legislator that rarely ate a meal or took a vacation that wasn't paid for by lobbyists. Aiding him was the local newspaper publisher, who simply would not print anything about his shenanigans. (This publisher also neglected to print anything about the entire county road commission being arrested for taking bribes.) Both of them were far to the right of Barry Goldwater.
Posted by: markm at April 19, 2005 8:19 AM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014