Don't Stop Me Now


Today is July 1st, and traffic cameras are officially dead in Virginia. The state legislature let the law permitting red-light (s)cameras expire, but not all cities are taking them down. Falls Church plans to leave them on, and use them in an innovative way.

State lawmakers failed to renew the pilot program, meaning the cameras have to stop clicking as of July 1. But the City of Falls Church plans to keep its video red-light system on in the name of safety. While still cameras only snap a picture of the offending vehicle's license plate, the video system has a unique feature.

"It automatically sort of gauges the speed and distance of a vehicle before it runs into the intersection, and then adjusts the lights accordingly," said Councilman David Snyder.

All the lights at the intersection remain red until the offending car passes. This reduces the risk of a T-bone style crash, in which a red-light runner hits a car proceeding with a green light.

"Our objective all along with this was public safety," said Snyder, who was the city's mayor when the cameras were first installed in 2001.

I look forward to running red lights all weekend long. Don't stop me now, I'm having such a good time, I'm having a ball.



Comments (5)      top   link me

Comments

You go, Freddy.

Posted by: Thibodeaux at July 1, 2005 10:42 AM

something used for safety rather than revenue. how unique!!

Posted by: Captain B at July 1, 2005 10:52 AM

The sad thing is that accidents are likely to drop to nearly zero a this light, which begs the question of why they weren't doing that all along if safety was the aim.

Posted by: Phelps at July 1, 2005 11:48 AM

Sounds ripe for "unintended consequenses": the lights with the cameras will delay the change to green for cross traffic giving the illusion that it is safe to "run" the light, but lights without the cameras will switch normally and it is NOT safe to be in the intersection.

I don't like the use of cameras for issuing fines but it also seems like a bad idea to condition people into thinking something that is improper conduct does not (potentionally) have bad consequenses.

Posted by: bob at July 1, 2005 2:56 PM

Why do you need the camera at all? What you need for safety is a motion sensor adjusted accordingly to look for moving traffic in the intersection connected to the light controller. It just holds the other side red when necessary.

Of course, this could have been done years ago, but I guess the city councils' hearts werent in it. Not enough cash involved ...

Posted by: Jimmy Antley at July 5, 2005 11:10 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer