TIME Magazine grades the Supreme Court justices as either staunch or moderate liberals, or staunch or moderate conservatives. Well almost. According to TIME, there are no staunch liberals, and hardly any moderate conservatives. See for yourself.

TIME says that the Supreme Court lacks "a deep blue liberal". To bring balance to the Court, perhaps George Bush should nominate a justice who:

- expressed strong sympathy for constitutional rights to bigamy and prostitution
- attacked the Boy and Girl Scouts for perpetuating sexual stereotypes
- proposed abolishing Mother's and Father's Day with an androgynous Parent's Day
- advocated an end to single sex prisons
- supported court-ordered quotas to change the racial composition of a workforce even in the absence of any intentional discrimination on the the part of the employer but failed to hire a single black in his/her 50 person office even though the city in which he/she worked was majority black.

TIME still wouldn't be happy, because these are the beliefs of the "moderate" Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

(Hat tip to Spoons)