Ravenwood - 08/08/05 06:45 AM
I had thought that most people knew that British TV was prohibitively expensive. But apparently now, so here's a brief education, thanks to turnoffyourtv.com, a "progressive" anti-TV site.
"Using a television without an appropriate licence is a criminal offence. Every day we catch an average of 1,200 people using a TV without a licence. There is no valid excuse for using a television and not having a TV Licence, but some people still try - sometimes with the most ridiculous stories ever heard. Our detection equipment will track down your TV. The fact that our enquiry officers are now so well equipped with the latest technology means that there is virtually no way to avoid detection." -- from the official website of the British Television Licensing Authority, May 2003A TV license costs about $200 per year. I know what you're thinking. How would they enforce such a ridiculous license? Well, they mandate tracking technology be installed in every TV set, another cost the consumer must bear.
They use the "TV Licensing database" with details of more than 26 million UK addresses -- and their television sets. Also, part of the work is done in special "detector vans." The TVLA website explains that "every TV contains a component called the 'local oscillator', which emits a signal when the television is switched on. It's this signal that the equipment on our vans picks up. But, what if you live in a block of flats or a house without road access? Well if this is the case our enquiry officer can simply use one of our hand-held scanners. Measuring both direction and strength of signal, they make it easy for us to locate television sets in hard to reach places."Of course removing the oscillator doesn't work, because simply not having a TV license is enough to raise suspicion. In fact, getting rid of your TV seems to make things worse:
In an email, Bennett wrote that "living without a television in the UK is not as simple as getting rid of the TV set. In the UK the licensing authority operates under legal statute giving them wide powers. The licensing authority have no real concept of the non-viewer and class them as suspect licence-dodgers. Thus, we are subject threats and other manner of persecution. Considering we are only refusing an entertainment service it is a ridiculous situation." [...]And don't forget that these ridiculous laws are enforced at the point of a gun. And with a disarmed populace it's all too easy.In one letter to Bennett, the TVLA stated that "there are a high number of people who advise us that they do not use TV equipment, but are subsequently found to be doing so." The letter goes on to say that if their inspectors find that no TV sets are present on the premises, then no further contact will be made -- until next year.
Without local oscillators the TV wouldn't work. It's not a special component.
That's why they pick that component to detect.
Actually you could build a TV that foiled detection though; but there's no reason to except in the UK, and there it's illegal.
It doesn't come out in the story, but this money goes to support the BBC, and its no use saying you dont like the Beeb, because thats tough. On the plus(?) side, there is no advertising on the Beeb, and you do occasionally get some decent programs.
Up till the seventies, there was also a RADIO licence that you where expected to buy, transistor radios took care of that as it became too expensive to try enforcing it.
Do they know you can watch TV on a computer (with a few added parts)?
Posted by: markm at August 8, 2005 11:49 AMOh we so need that tax in the US....I think Hillary, Kerry and every Democrat ought to make it a campaign pledge to tax our TV's
Posted by: Sgt Fluffy at August 8, 2005 1:34 PMThey do the same thing in New Zealand. Some people I know there did not have a TV, at least while their children were young (and FWIW they were among the best behaved kids I've ever met). When the TV tax inspector came demanding they pay up, they told him to pound sand. Guy wouldn't believe them when they said they had no TV and demanded to be allowed to search the house. Again they told him to pound sand and eventually he left (without ever gaining entry).
Posted by: Andrew Upson at August 8, 2005 1:36 PMUn-FUCKING-believable. This is almost inconceivable in the US because we have the first amendment, but most likely, the libs over on this side of the pond just never thought of it. That's just outrageous.
The only thing they're allowed to watch is the BBC right? No cable or anything like that? No wonder the left has so thoroughly taken hold of that once Great Britain.
We had a BBC reporter embedded with us in Iraq, and on the slow news days, we would sit and watch as this guy MADE SHIT UP off the top of his head, on LIVE TV.
This is just unbelievable. I'm at a loss.
No, they have other channels. BBC is kinda like their PBS. But instead of pledge drives and income tax money, they tax TVs. And the BBC has the power to set the level of the tax.
Posted by: Ravenwood at August 9, 2005 6:10 AM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014