Clarence Thomas, still not black enough


Late last month editorialists at the Milwaukee Journal-Sentenel made the claim that
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas shouldn't count as being black because all black people think alike and he's doesn't think like them.

In losing a woman, the court with Alito would feature seven white men, one white woman and a black man, who deserves an asterisk because he arguably does not represent the views of mainstream black America.
"Arguably" indeed. Well this week they're standing by the editorial, and making the claim that it's no longer even arguable that Clarence Thomas doesn't represent "mainstream black America". Gregory Stanford (who is black) claims to be the author and defends the editorial by claiming that it's a matter of fact that Thomas conflicts with "mainstream black America".
A recent Journal Sentinel editorial touched on Thomas' record and in so doing raised a firestorm. In an aside, the editorial said that, as far as diversity is concerned, Thomas deserves an asterisk because his views lie outside the mainstream of African-American thinking.

I wrote that editorial, reflecting the consensus view of this paper's Editorial Board - a view that remains unchanged despite the furor...

To my dismay, what I believed to be a mere statement of fact drew charges of racism. Conservative talk radio and the right-wing blogosphere fanned the flames... [Heh, that's me.]

The aside merely stated a fact we best recognize: The views of Clarence Thomas lie outside mainstream black thought.

Stanford goes out of his way to cite examples of "mainstream black thought", and show ways that Clarence Thomas differs from that view. What he's missing though is the point.

To say that Thomas or other black conservatives aren't black because their views conflict with the majority of black Americans is elitist and prejudicial. He presumes that blacks should prescribe to certain ideals, and any blacks who don't are traitors to their race. I wonder how Stanford feels about racial profiling, because that's precisely what he's doing.


Category:  Blaming the Media
Comments (2)      top   link me

Comments

So what are the "views of mainstream black Americans"? After all the stories I've heard of black kids persecuting other black kids for studying ("acting white"), and all the begging for handouts I've heard from adult black leaders, I think that no one who holds to those views would meet the minimum requirements of scholarship and hard work to pass the bar exam, let alone get appointed to the Supreme Court.

Posted by: markm at November 15, 2005 11:01 AM

More from the MILWUAKLE URINAL what else will they say in this birdcage linner

Posted by: sandpiper at November 18, 2005 10:59 AM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer