Ravenwood - 06/26/08 06:30 AM
This article in the Washington Post (of all places) is a gentle reminder that the D.C. gun ban goes deeper than just banning guns.
The story is about Allan Lucas, a former Marine and Police Officer. Lucas was granted a D.C. gun instructor's license, but has been unable to open a shop because of D.C.'s anti-gun bureacracy. To teach police officers, security officers, and the privileged few who are permitted to carry guns in the District, Lucas has to take them to gun ranges in Virginia or Maryland.
Lucas tried opening his own business in D.C. and was caught in a catch-22.
To open such a business, you'd need a site zoned for a range. And there is no zoning category that allows a range. . .And if D.C. loses the Heller case. . .At one point, a zoning administrator told Lucas that the problem was that it had been so long since the city had licensed a gun range that it simply didn't know how to do so.
The need for a range will soon become far more pressing, Lucas figures. "If you're going to let people have weapons, they're going to need a place to train," he says. "The worst thing you can do is legalize guns and have no way for people to learn how to handle them safely."
(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014