Ravenwood - 07/31/03 06:15 AM
John Hawkins is in list making mode again. He asked everyone which movies they thought were the best. Here is my list. Compare it to the films that actually made the top 15. Apparently I'm the only Kubrick fan. I wonder if the 6 morons that picked The Matrix are the same 6 morons that picked This is Spinal Tap. Both good films, but greatest of all time? Better than African Queen, E.T., or The Graduate?
This was a difficult list to put together. I started with about 50 films, and had to cut it way down.
A Clockwork Orange
African Queen
Blues Brothers
Casablanca
Citizen Kane
Deliverence
Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
Driving Miss Daisy
E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial
Empire of the Sun
Forrest Gump
Glory
Godfather
Goodfellas
The Graduate
Jurassic Park
Kramer vs. Kramer
Mister Roberts
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
Raiders of the Lost Ark
Rain Man
Star Wars
To Kill a Mockingbird
Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
Wizard of Oz
Ravenwood - 07/31/03 06:00 AM
I want to take a moment to talk about need. Whenever you hear a gun fearing wussy talking about taking our rights away, some moron invariably pops up and says, "you don't need an [insert evil gun type]". As soon as someone says "you don't need a machine gun", or "assault rifle", or "handgun", I know exactly which hole they are speaking out of.
No debate should ever come down to a question of need. When you start trying to justify property ownership on the basis of need, you start down a path that could rid us of many of today's modern devices. For instance, any one of us could get along without our refrigerator, television, computer, telephone, video game system, toaster, or even electricity. The automobile strikes me as being particularly unnecessary.
From a personal standpoint, you could rely on public transportation, or simply just walk every where you go. Sure, you'd have to reorganize your life, perhaps by finding a job nearer to where you live, but getting rid of your car would mostly just be a huge annoyance.
From a national standpoint, you can compare and contrast guns and cars quite easily. Each year, tens of thousands of people are directly killed by the automobile. Guns, on the other hand, are used defensively in private hands to save millions of lives each year. You could argue that policemen and firemen use automobiles to save lives, but then again, they also use guns. Conversely, you might find a policeman on foot, horseback, bicycle, or even roller blades, but you'll almost never find him without his gun.
Plus, with cars there are all sorts of indirect concerns like pollution, or dependence on fossil fuels. Cars create smog that chokes our nation's urban areas, and they add to noise pollution which forces us to keep our windows shut and build huge sound barricades along our suburban interstates. Sure, a gunshot may be louder than a car, but the overall ambient noise and sheer volume of cars creates quite a nuisance.
In history, cars are just over 100 years old, whereas guns have been around for centuries. After our nation was founded, we survived over 100 years without a single automobile. How long would we have survived without a single gun? Sure, both are crucial to today's military, but a soldier on horseback with a good rifle still stands a better chance of surviving than if he were driving around in a car with no gun. (Although either one could still probably conquer France.)
Whether you want to admit it or not, you could probably do without your car. Sure, you'd have to rely on public transportation, and your quality of life would decline, but it could be done. Hell, you could even resort to walking everywhere and probably live a longer and healthier life. For longer distances, you might want to invest in a horse and buggy. It seems to work for the Amish, so why not you.
Ravenwood - 07/31/03 06:00 AM
California efforts to ban .50 BMG ammo came and went this summer. Although the proposed ban died in committee, it raises genuine concern for our right to bear arms, and wacky Kalifornia politicians views on crime. The San Jose Mercury News goes on record as supporting the ban. They claim that it is only a matter of time before criminals pony up the $1000 for a .50 caliber rifle, and go on a killing spree.
The gun is powerful enough to punch a hole in an oil tank or take down a civilian airplane. Its 5 1/2-inch long bullets can pierce an inch of armor 40 yards away and hit a target a mile away. A massive weapon, with some models weighing in at 28 pounds, it's ill-suited for hunters -- it would take out a deer and the tree behind it -- but ideal for assassins.They also note that it's easier to (gasp!) buy one of these evil monstrosities than it is to buy a handgun. Sure, you wouldn't hunt deer with a .50, but you might take on a rhino or elephant with it. Personally, I don't care if there is no hunting purpose for it at all, or no reason to need one. You have no need to own a car either, and they kill more people per year than guns.
The fact is that banning the .50 BMG will solve nothing, and prevent nothing, and the idea that you can get one of these for a mere $1000 is a misnomer. The cheapest .50 on this list is more than twice that. Some of the rifles cost five figures. You aren't likely to find a $1000 model that is deadly accurate at 1 mile, like they would have you believe. Even if criminals were able to steal one, they aren't likely to pony up $1.50 per round to fire the damned thing.
Even if they had the gun and the ammo, the rifle isn't very practical for mass killing or terrorism. This cheap ($2400) carbine looks pretty unwieldy. You wouldn't exactly hide it under your coat. Add a scope to it, and you aren't likely to hide the thing in your car either. They even admit that the rifles typically weigh more than 25 lbs, and firing a 700+ grain round out of one of them at speeds upwards of Mach 3, is going to sound just a bit like a cannon going off. Not exactly conducive for stealth. Of course, with it's pistol grip, heat shield, and muzzle brake, the detachable magazine versions are already illegal in California under their "assault weapons" ban.
Of course, the idea of banning this gun, does nothing to stem crime. The truth is that the .50 BMG is never used in crime. Not hardly, not rarely, NEVER. Not only would a shooter have to go unnoticed while he set up his perch, but he'd have to have some fortifications in place to keep from being busted right away. The sheer size of the gun means you aren't exactly picking it up and running with it before the cops arrive. In a terrorism capacity, you'd do much better with a poodleshooter AR-15 or Bushmaster like the Washington snipers used. Hell, you could create more fear by shooting some random person with a .22 and walking away than you could trying to lug one of these around. As far as killing power goes, you could do more damage with a rental van and some ANFO, something that was proven in Oklahoma City and the first World Trade Center bombing.
Sure, the rifle may be deadly and effective when mounted on an Army Humvee, but in the private sector it's nothing more than an expensive novelty. Banning it is just another empty promise of gun control. The gun fearing wussys may sleep better at night, but in the end, they aren't any safer than they were before.
For more reading, check out this letter to the Chief of the LAPD. Apparently the department is in the habit of using public money, and their very own LEO model .50 caliber, which is already illegal for civilians, to crusade for tougher gun control laws.
Ravenwood - 07/31/03 06:00 AM
MSNBC reports that Aussies are planning some Koala population control.
Female koalas are being given contraception in the Australian state of Victoria because the population is eating itself out of house and home. [...]We practice population control with animals here in the United States, too. It's called hunting."We have found that relocation and surgical sterilization hasn't worked that well, so now we're shifting to a more humane, large scale option which is basically putting them on the pill."
Rather than actually allow people to hunt the bears with firearms, and generate some revenue while their at it, Australia is going to spend taxpayer money to put Koala's on "the pill". Ironically, the bears are still considered a protected species, which tells me that their version of the Endangered Species Act is just as corrupt and bogus as ours.
Ravenwood - 07/31/03 06:00 AM
I have a hard time believing this. The Duke would have kicked Stalin's ass!
Still, I could see that House UnAmerican Activities Committee propaganda film, Big Jim McLain getting him in trouble with the Reds.
Ravenwood - 07/31/03 06:00 AM
MSNBC is reports on the visually stunning Russian.
Anna Kournikova's tennis career may be in jeopardy after her agent revealed Tuesday a long-standing back injury may force her out of the game.Who knew Anna even played tennis? Now that I think about it, in some of her signature moments like this one, she may have been holding a tennis racket.
Ravenwood - 07/30/03 06:00 AM
Ravenwood - 07/30/03 06:00 AM
Kim du Toit will be celebrating his birthday for an entire week this year, and thus Ammo Day has been extended. In case you are unfamiliar with Ammo Day, the idea is to get more rounds of ammo into private hands, and thus negate the effect of any sort of prohibitive tax.
It's a good theory, but as Kim notes, it can be a bitch to put into practice. Kim laments that Ammo Day was a failure, or at best, a partial success. I disagree. I think Ammo Day was highly successful, in that it raised awareness. Prior to Ammo Day, I kept very little ammo on hand. If I went shooting, I just bought some at the range. Now, I've got... well, let's just say that I need to buy a few more ammo cans, and leave it at that.
The spirit of ammo day was not lost on me, and I'm sure it touched a lot of other people too. Hopefully those supporters will enlighten a few friends for this year's event, and those friends will tell even more people next year.
Rome wasn't built in a day, and even the best ideas take time to catch on. Still, extending it to a week was a good idea, and should enhance the ammo buying fun.
Ravenwood - 07/30/03 06:00 AM
Am I the only one that thinks Christopher Reeve comes off as selfish and arrogant when he champions causes that directly benefit him. I guess that most special interest groups are always trying to get more government funding for their cause, but he has a way of sounding like he's being denied of an entitlement.
Actor Christopher Reeve told an Israeli audience Tuesday he thinks there is a good chance he will walk again -- provided "politics and religion" don't interfere with scientific research. [...]I'm all for finding new cures, and treatments for any ailment, but Reeve rubs me the wrong way, when he seems to blame others for not curing his self-inflicted injury. It really sucks that he fell off his horse and suffered a back injury, but this "I'd be walking by now if they'd spend more money researching my paralysis" attitude has to go."My hopes are that politics and religion will not interfere with progress for a cure," Reeve said Tuesday. "If those problems are overcome, I stand a good chance of walking."
Ravenwood - 07/30/03 06:00 AM
Remember all those Puerto Ricans that were furious at President Bush for the Navy's testing at Vieques? Al Sharpton flew down there, and everyone was protesting and blaming Bush for live fire testing that the military had been doing for decades. Clinton had promised to end testing, and Bush warned them that it might mean job losses for the island.
Now Fox News reports that Puerto Rico is whining about the Navy base closure. They are accusing the government and Navy of "economic revenge". I guess we are supposed to keep the base open, and just let everyone sit around doing nothing.
Ravenwood - 07/30/03 06:00 AM
Bill Clinton Declares California Residency -- Scrappleface, July 24, 2003.
Bill and Hillary Clinton will inject themselves in to the historic California recall battle -- Drudge Report, July 28, 2003.
Ravenwood - 07/29/03 07:35 PM
A pox on me for not doing enough testing. The templates weren't displaying well at all in Mozilla. So, for the 3% of readers that use Netscape, I've changed the templates back. I'll be working on finding a fix for netscape, and then I'll reconvert to CSS.
Sorry to my Netscape readers for the inconvenience.
UPDATE: I've put the CSS templates back up. Screw those netscape losers. Ok, not really. I figured out that nescape was wigging out over the position inheritance in the DIVs. Once I deleted the inheritance instructions from the CSS files, everything started working fine. Or so it would appear.
Please let me know if you find any bugs. It should display correctly in the latest versions of Netscape and IE now. I'm still not completely happy with the netscape look and feel, but I don't have time to tweak it right now.
UPDATE: If it was displaying garbled earlier, you may need to SHIFT-REFRESH your browser to get it you clear out your cache and re-read all the files. I noticed that Netscape didn't correct the errors unless I forced it to reload the pages with the correct style sheets.
While I'll try to address all browser compatibility issues, please realize that I primarily program this site for IE. Looking at my stats, more than 85% of the users read this site with Internet Explorer. Netscape/Mozilla users are 4.7% and 2.2% respectively. Opera, Safari, Galeon, and Lynx users are all less than 1%. I'm sorry, but I cannot address problems for every browser out there. Remember, there is always the PDA version and numerous XML versions to choose from.
Ravenwood - 07/29/03 05:34 PM
Someone pissed in Mr. Coons cheerios this morning. He doesn't have a permalink to today's miniblog entry, so I'll just quote the entire thing.
I haven't witnessed any ENBs, save Phillip's. (The excessive use of exclamation points is the first sign.) Then again, I haven't had a lot of time to really look for any. With some people it's hard to tell if they are having a nervous breakdown, or they just overdosed on coffee.
I'M DISGUSTED WITH......the whole concept of blogs and blogging (or at least what most of them have degenerated to)!!! IMHO there are some serious "sick puppies" out there!!! I've simply had it with "bionic dick" tales (and all the clever comments about same), witnessing several of what amount to "electronic nervous breakdowns", and well just about everything connected with blogging. Doesn't mean I'll stop reading the few of my favorites, I just don't want to be part of it anymore!!! Buh-bye!!!
Oh well, it makes for some entertainment to cure the doldrums. I'm reminded of the time my friend Ken kept picking on this guy's last nerve. The guy got so upset, he finally stood up and charged at Ken screaming "I can't take it anymore." Needless to say, he never made it there. There's a reason Ken always surrounded himself with big friends.
Ravenwood - 07/29/03 06:00 AM
The AP reports that Texas lawmakers have run for the border again, and this time it's Democrat members of the Senate. With 11 of 12 democrats gone, the Senate doesn't have enough members present to vote on anything.
The lawmakers are apparently hiding in Albuquerque, New Mexico. In case you've forgotten, the House lawmakers tried a similar ploy back in May, when they fled to Oklahoma.
I hope they aren't putting all these frequent flee-er miles on their government credit cards.
Ravenwood - 07/29/03 06:00 AM
Just in case you were running out of reasons to hate the French, the Washington Times reports that America has asked France for help in Iraq, and they've declined. At issue is the political control of the situation. France wants the U.N. to have total political control.
Of course, usually when we helped France out, it was the Nazis or the Communists that had political control, and the French were standing their with their hands in the air.
Ravenwood - 07/29/03 06:00 AM
In 2000, Pam Grunow's husband was tragically murdered by a 13 year old student the last day of school. The young teen stole a pistol from a neighbor, and used it to gun down the teacher outside his classroom. He was ultimately convicted for murder.
Grunow sued the gun distributor, Valor Corporation, alleging the product was "defective". She lost, and now Valor is counter-suing her to recoup legal fees. The AP offers up this sob story:
Pam Grunow's attorney, Rebecca Larson, said the widow was worried about losing her house if she was forced by the court to reimburse the gun company. The estate has no assets, Larson said.Boo hoo hoo. Perhaps she should have thought of that before bringing a frivolous lawsuit. Forgive me if I sound unsympathetic. Grunow has suffered a tragic loss, and she may have been coerced into bringing a malicious lawsuit. Groups like the Violence Policy Center, or Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun
Either way, she is the one ultimately responsible for bringing forth a baseless lawsuit, that had absolutely no legal merit. Valor is simply trying collect their lost legal fees. As is typical in America, this is just another case of the bloodsucking lawyers getting rich and everyone else involved losing their shirt.
UPDATE: Kevin covers this in much greater detail.
Ms. Grunow sued the legal owner of the gun for the previous EIGHT YEARS, the pawnshop that sold the gun 13 YEARS BEFORE THE CRIME, Valor - the distributor that sold the gun originally, and the school system. (Edited to add: The gun was the same age as the shooter. Kinda makes you wonder which was the "defective product" doesn't it?) She settled out of court with the gun's legal owner for $300,000, with the pawn shop for $275,000, and with the school system for $245,000.He also notes that Valor originally offered a settlement of $200,000, and that although she is claiming she's broke, Grunow received over $820,000 settlement money.
Ravenwood - 07/29/03 06:00 AM
Congressman Dick Gephardt, who used to represent Missouri, took a break from campaigning today to pay homage to the late great Bob Hope, who died at the age of 100. Gephardt personally contacted Hope's family to offer his condolences, and urge them to quickly settle Hope's estate. With a net worth estimated anywhere between $100 Million and $1 Billion, the government stands to make quite a financial windfall with the death tax.
"If we get that money before the end of the year, we might be able to extend child tax credits to the working poor, who didn't win life's lottery like Mr. Hope," claimed Gephardt. The congressman also said that if elected president, he'd do executive orders to make sure that the super rich didn't ignore their patriotic duty to pay the death tax, when it sunsets for one year in 2010.
Ravenwood - 07/28/03 05:55 PM
Ravenwood - 07/28/03 07:00 AM
The AP reports that Patre Eugene Williams faced 30 years in prison for selling cocaine within 1000 feet of school property. With the trial winding down, Williams couldn't bear to wait and see what the verdict would be. So, he asked for a recess and fled the courtroom.
Judge Thompson gave Williams 15 minutes to return, then said, "We're going to finish the trial without him."Although he certainly acted like it, he was found not guilty. The Judge didn't bother issuing a bench warrant, and Williams was not found in contempt.The two sides presented closing arguments, and the jury returned after 30 minutes with the verdict.
Ravenwood - 07/28/03 07:00 AM
Sky News reports that Tony Martin is due to be freed from prison. He is the UK farmer who defending himself from attack, killing one man and injuring another. Martin was routinely turned down for early release, because he was considered to be a "danger to burglars".
Coincidentally, the goblin that Martin wounded is being released from prison on the same day. Brendan Fearon, who has been described as a 'career criminal', was in prison for an unrelated charge of heroin dealing.
By the way, Fearon is being released early, after serving less than one third of his 18th month sentence.
In related news, Fearon is dropping his taxpayer funded legal claim against Martin for shooting him, however. What a nice guy.
Related articles:
UK continues to champion criminal's rights II - 07/21/2003
UK continues to champion criminal's rights - 06/16/2003
UK Parole Board concerned about "burglar's rights" - 05/12/2003
Ravenwood - 07/28/03 07:00 AM
The AP has an update on the anti-backpack crusade. Several Arizona schools have banned backpacks because of the potential back problems they cause. It beats the hell out of teaching students the proper way to carry their books.
Curiously, they don't bother to say just how students are supposed to carry their books. Do students have to carry them all loose, or did they just stop assigning homework as well? Maybe they'll go back to strapping their belt around it like in the old days.
Related articles:
The Sissification of America II - 06/11/2003
The Sissification of America - 05/12/2003
The Empire Strikes Backpack - 01/06/2003
California trades back pain for eye strain - 10/14/2003
Ravenwood - 07/28/03 07:00 AM
The AP is just flabbergasted as to why President Bush isn't meeting with the NAALCP. Every President since Warren G. Harding has paid homage to the left wing lobbying group, but not ol' W. I was going to try to explain why, but then I remembered that I don't have to. Someone has already covered that here, and here.
Ravenwood - 07/27/03 09:10 PM
I've converted the main template over to CSS. Getting rid of the nested tables, should make the page load a lot quicker. Also, you may notice that the body text loads before the sidebar, which is another convenience just for you.
I'll be working on converting over the monthly and category archives next, as they really need it. Eventually I'll get to the individual archives. Let me know if you see any bugs. You may need to reselect a style sheet from the sidebar on the left.
Considering I knew almost nothing about CSS when I started, I think it looks pretty good.
UPDATE: If I ever get trackback working, perhaps I'll implement something like this guy or this guy.
Ravenwood - 07/26/03 11:32 PM
ScrappleFace hits the nail on the head:
(2003-07-26) -- A day after the National Football League fined the Detroit Lions $200,000 for failing to interview black coaches when it hired Steve Mariucci, the league has ordered all quarterbacks to consider blacks as primary receivers on pass plays.More?
Ravenwood - 07/26/03 10:45 AM
With 2000 combat Marines being positioned off the coast of Liberia, it is inevitable that anti-war protesters will be painting their "No Blood for Mineral Resources" signs and picketing the White House this weekend. Liberia has no WMDs, no Saddam Hussein, and no other reason to go to war, except for their rich mineral resources.
The Bush Administration has an image problem. "Liberia has rich mineral resources," claims Arthur Vandelay, an architecture student at William and Mary College in Virginia. "Clearly, Bush and his buddies at the big mineral resource companies have wanted to get their hands on them since Bush was selected back in 2000."
While he was able to disguise his quest for Iraqi oil under the guise of an illegal attempted uranium purchase from Niger, President Bush has no such excuse for Liberia. Without a good reason to invade, the American people won't support another war.
Ravenwood - 07/26/03 10:00 AM
The Washington Times reports that Former House Minority Leader and Presidential candidate Dick 'Gebhardt' was on the campaign trail in South Carolina this week. Gephardt, who in May was reported to have missed 85% of the House votes, missed a vote on a Republican Head Start Bill that passed by a single vote. The two absent Democrats that could have killed the Republican bill were Ed Paster of Arizona, whose father had suffered a heart attack, and Dick Gephardt, who supposedly represents Missouri.
There is no word on whether or not Gephardt, as President, would do executive orders to overturn the Head Start bill, should it become law.
Ravenwood - 07/26/03 09:00 AM
I pulled this beauty from the High Priest's web site. It's supposed to be some sort of optical illusion, but I just don't see it. I never was good at these things.
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 07:20 PM
Despite all the exposure "Hunting for Bambi" is getting, your's truly ended up at the number 2 spot on Lycos.
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 06:10 PM
The AP reports that reverse discrimination has hit the NFL with a vengeance, with League Commish Paul Tagliabue fining the Detroit Lions president $200K for hiring Steve Mariucci. Mariucci was the only person interviewed for the job, and Tagliabue claims that bigger fines will come if minorities aren't given preferential treatment for interviews.
Of course, the problem with the Mariucci hiring was that all the minority applicants refused interviews. The Lions say that "five minority candidates turned down interviews because it appeared inevitable Mariucci would be hired." (Who'd want to coach a 2-14 team any way?)
The real downside to reverse discrimination will be that quality football coaches like Tony Dungy will be perceived as being hired or interviewed, just to fill the quota and avoid the fine. The policy will diminish and overshadow their real gift for coaching. Gene Upshaw, executive director of the NFL Players Association tries to defend the League's actions.
"The Detroit Lions gave mere lip service to the agreed-upon minority hiring process, treating it almost as if a nuisance to their hiring of Steve Mariucci," Upshaw said at the time. "The minority candidates were never given a fair chance to interview. In this case, the Lions' position is indefensible."A nuisance is exactly what it is. Hiring an NFL coach is pretty much like casting the starring role in a Hollywood movie. NFL teams don't exactly post an ad on monster.com and wade through a pool of applicants. When a vacancy comes up, they run down the short list of candidates they want to fill the position. They look for coaches that they envision filling the role. That pool of guys is extremely small, and usually includes only previous NFL coaches, a handful of assistant coaches, and very few college coaches. This time, the Lions list only contained one name, and it wasn't a black guy, so they got dinged by the NFL.
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 05:15 PM
It's time for the Friday Five.
1. If your life were a movie, what would the title be?
"Masturbates with Wolves"
2. What songs would be on the soundtrack?
"Pop goes the world" - Men Without Hats
"Cruel Summer" - Bananarama
3. Would it be a live-action film or animated? Why?
It would be the cheesiest low-budget piece of trash anyone has ever seen. Live action or animated? Does it really matter?
4. Casting: who would play you, members of your family, friends, etc?
It would be one of those fucking annoying Martin Short movies where he plays every role.
5. Describe the movie preview/trailer.
The trailer would make you run screaming from the theater, and the movie would replace Woody Allen films as a third world torture device. It would lower the bar for bad movies everywhere.
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 04:48 PM
Kevin has a wonderful article about gun control in Scotland. He notes that in Scotland, where "shotgun-toting criminals felt safe enough to blast a cop at the police station" their main focus of concern is over the handful of legally owned and registered long guns. (All handguns are illegal.)
Their assumption is that the mere proliferation of legally owned rifles and shotguns, (all 80,000 of them) is what is feeding the increasing crime rate. The logical conclusion from their assinine assumption would be that less legally owned firearms would mean less crime.
If that's the case, they should just get it over with, and ban guns completely. Hell, it's worked so well for DC, right? I mean, it's not like they're the murder capital or anything.
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 02:50 PM
Taranto (third item) apparently missed (or ignored) this connection.
"[Saddam] Hussein was invited to speak at the funeral by the commander of allied ground forces in Iraq, Army Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez." -- Scrappleface, July 22.
"U.S. officials said the bodies would be stored in a refrigerated tent at Baghdad International Airport until a family member came forward to claim them." -- Associated Press, July 25
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 02:40 PM
The Washington Post weighs in on the DC gun ban. Naturally, they are in favor of citizens being forbidden from owning firearms, and find it offensive that Senator Orrin Hatch would want to restore freedom to the people. Of course, they also profess that the idea of a few select lawmakers banning firearms for the whole of the law abiding populace is simply "the ability of District residents to make their own decisions". I guess they think that Orrin Hatch would be requiring citizens to own a firearm, rather than letting them decide individually; something that only Kennesaw, Georgia* has thus far been able to do.
Of course, they also make the claim that criminals will be delighted about the prospect of law abiding citizens owning firearms. Burglars and muggers must be better sports than I thought, if they prefer to have a victim that is armed versus one that is unarmed and helpless. I think this pretty much sums up the Post's view on guns:
The best way to dry up this supply of guns would be for Congress to enact a federal law extending the District protections to Maryland, Virginia and all other states.In case you were wondering, by "protections", they mean "gun ban", and by "all other states", they mean yours.
*In 1982, Kennesaw Georgia passed a law requiring (with few exceptions) all heads of households to own at least one firearm. Crime plummeted the next year. Shortly after passage of the law, city lawmakers even passed the hat to purchase a gun for an elderly lady who wanted to comply, but could not afford to.
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 02:00 PM
With the shooting death of Councilman Davis in New York a few days ago, city leaders across America are undoubtedly raising concerns about their own safety, and drifting closer to earning "Gun Fearing Wussy" status. In Virginia, where persons with a concealed handgun permit are allowed to carry in most municipal buildings, including the capitol building, irrational fear is exceptionally high. Of course, what aggravates the fear, is that local governments are not permitted to ban permit holders from public buildings, under the state preemption law.
The Virginian Pilot notes that the debate about firearm possession has really been heating up following the New York shooting.
In municipal buildings, tempers sometimes run high over disputes concerning taxes, property taxes and parking tickets, [Jim Sollo, board chairman of the Virginians Against HandgunThat is ridiculous. Brandishing a firearm without just cause is a crime, with or without a permit. Doing so in a city building that is filled with police officers might just get you thrown out of the gene pool.ViolenceOwnership] said, and firearms should be restricted from the potentially volatile environments.Even if guns are merely shown and not used, he said, "it could be intimidating to public servants."
Of course, the whole New York incident is a complete red herring. Councilman Davis was shot by someone he knew rather well, and someone he had invited into the building. Comparing that to "random" violence doesn't measure up. Plus, New York already has strict gun control, which clearly wasn't enough to help Mr. Davis.
That doesn't stop politicians in Northern Virginia from trying to create the false analogy. Today's Fairfax Journal (subscriber only) notes that the incident in New York has caused Alexandria City Councilwoman Joyce Woodson to "flip out".
"It sort of gives rise to the fear that many of us live with in Virginia," Woodson said. "I would like to see greater security in public buildings, especially since Virginia law allows people to carry concealed handguns as long as they are licensed."Apparently Woodson lives in fear more because of licensed permit holders than because of the thugs that wander the streets of Alexandria day in and day out. She must lead a sheltered life.
At the center of all of the debate, is the mind set of the gun fearing wussy. I honestly believe that these people have trouble controlling their emotions. I can only presume that Sollo fears that people will go on a shooting rampage, because that is something he would do if you made him angry enough. Ms. Woodson is apparently more afraid to go to work then she is wandering the streets of Alexandria.
Ironically, even banning guns in government buildings will not make them gun free. For one thing, the police will have guns. For another, it is impossible to make any facility gun free. We cannot keep guns out of our schools, off our airplanes, or even out of our prisons. (If you don't believe me about the availability of weapons in prison, just ask this guy.)
Of course, you should also ask yourself just what is it that these politicians are doing, that they are so worried about being dragged out of their offices and shot because of it.
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 12:00 PM
The Washington Times reports that trial lawyers are hoping to strike it rich by suing "Big Ice Cream". Apparently there is the silly notion that ice cream is fattening. Who knew?
Well, apparently a lot of people were clueless about the dangers of over-indulgence of the creamy treat. They've been mindlessly gobbling up the fatty goodness for years, without the slightest inkling that it could lead to obesity. Since it's obviously not their fault, they have no other choice but to take legal action.
Of course, it all makes me wonder how The Onion could have been so prophetic. I remember first reading this story back in 2000, and thinking about how absurd it all sounded. I even printed it out and posted it on the wall of my office at work. Of course, by now, most people have heard about the famed Onion parody about lawyers suing "Big Chocolate." The story made several arguments against the candy industry, many of which are actually being parroted in today's legal circles. Three years ago next month, the Onion wrote:
"Let this verdict send a clear message to Big Chocolate," said Pennsylvania Attorney General Andrew Garsten, addressing reporters following the historic ruling. "If you knowingly sell products that cause obesity, you will pay." [...]At the time it was all in good fun, but it sounds eerily similar to what lawyers are actually claiming today. The Times notes:[Hershey's] "knowingly and willfully marketing rich, fatty candy bars containing chocolate and other ingredients of negligible nutritional value." The company was also charged with publishing nutritional information only under pressure from the government, marketing products to children, and artificially "spiking" their products with such substances as peanuts, crisped rice, and caramel to increase consumer appeal.
More than 100 lawyers and health lobbyists met in Boston June 20-22 to map out a strategy of filing obesity-liability lawsuits, particularly against the food industry. [...]Apparently the people gorging themselves on ice cream have been duped for all these years. And of course, there is the lovely new "obesity liability lawsuit" terminology. As if Turkey Hill is holding a gun to people's head to make them eat ice cream."Your failure to disclose such obviously material information as unusually large calorie and saturated-fat loads may violate state consumer-protection laws and/or your common-law duty to disclose material facts, and may invite lawsuits from concerned consumers, legal-action organizations, or even state officials," read one letter addressed to Haagen-Dazs President David Keil.
I see the lack of any personal responsibility as a side affect of the "me generation", and the baby boomers. I can only hope that when they die out, their lunacy will too. Personally, I was fortunate enough to be raised by pre-baby boom parents, who actually knew how to raise their kids. Growing up, I wasn't allowed to chew gum because it would rot my teeth, and sugared cereals were purchased sparingly. My sister and I certainly never had access to some of today's sugar packed foods like General Mill's "Cinnamon Toast Crunch", whose sales pitch was "You can actually see the cinnamon and sugar in every bite."
Of course, my parents also believed in corporal punishment. Although they deny it now, I have vivid memories of my father reaching for that yard stick he kept by his chair. Don't take that the wrong way, they were never abusive. They just didn't let their kids walk all over them the way today's parents do. Personally, I'm a better person for it. It's too bad that now-a-days parents are threatened with jail for exercising just about any sort of discipline.
As I grew older, my parents rewarded me with considerable freedom, as long as my obligations for school and work were met. Ironically, at the time, I viewed my parents as tyrants. If I wanted something, I had to actually work for it, rather than have it handed to me, like some of my friends. When I was 12 years old, I worked a paper route to earn extra money. I used the money to purchase a TV for my room and I even used it to buy a water bed. When I was 14, I quit my paper route and started working a real job over the summers. Although I was allowed to use my mom's car when I got older, I couldn't have my own unless I bought and paid for it myself. Oh, woe is me.
Unbeknownst to me at the time, their type of rearing was building character. Apparently, I really didn't know everything, and my parents really didn't just live to see me suffer.
Too many of today's kids are just handed things at birth. You see kids with cell phones and pagers, and teenager's are driving around in BMW's and Camaro's. When I lived in Atlanta, I used to read about kids that would wreck the car that daddy got for them, only a few weeks after receiving it. Instead of facing discipline, their parents simply went out and bought them another car. What kind of lesson does that teach someone? It's the same lesson that tells people it's okay to sue Breyer's because they ate too much ice cream.
Ravenwood - 07/25/03 10:53 AM
This is why I think that Oliver Willis is the greatest hope for liberals to break into talk radio.
Ravenwood - 07/24/03 05:37 PM
Well, here's somebody that doesn't think Jessica Lynch deserves all the hoopla.
Ravenwood - 07/24/03 05:20 PM
"If I had my way, I would say, 'You can't do that,' " -- Mary Norwood, Atlanta city councilman, expressing her desire to regulate the size of people's homes.
That kind of attitude is what makes me refuse to join a homeowner's association. Sure, my neighbors sometimes had unmowed grass, and I had no recourse if one of them decide to put a rusted out old truck up on blocks in their front yard. But the other extreme, is that nosy neighbor that walks down the street with a ruler, measuring the height of people's lawns. (My parents actually had a neighbor who did that.)
Maybe it's just the libertarian in me, but I really don't worry about what somebody does with their own land. I realize that property values are a product of the neighborhood, but I still think freedom is worth more than the price of your home. If you are really worried about your property values, than you should buy more land. If you have several acres, a buyer isn't likely to care what your neighbor's house looks like.
Then again, it's much easier (and cheaper) to just use the police power of the government to exert control over your neighbors. After all, telling someone "You can't do that" is free, right?
Ravenwood - 07/24/03 01:00 PM
The Boston Globe notes that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is number one in fee hikes, and shows just how gullible and ignorant some taxpayers are.
"We used the occasion of the fiscal emergency to look at our fee schedule and make adjustments. Yes, fees did go up, but taxes did not." -- Eric Fehrnstrom, communications director for Republican Governor Mitt Romney.
"There's less political fallout for fees, the general public isn't conflicted. They just say, 'Oh good; you didn't raise our taxes.' " -- Rep. Paul Casey, the House taxation chairman, (yes they actually have a chairman of taxation).
"We really need to measure what happens when we raise taxes and what happens when we raise fees." Rep. Anne Paulsen.
Of course, anyone with a brain should recognize that fees are just another form of taxation, and a dangerous one at that. People aren't affected by fees until they go to use a government service, and thus don't have as big of a negative reaction to them. Also, if the fee is for a service they don't need or won't ever use, they tend to have an apathetic reaction to a fee hike. For instance, I never go to concerts at the Virginia Beach amphitheater, so I didn't really care when the city jacked up the mandatory parking fee for every ticket sold.
What is most dangerous is that fees are used by governments as an attempt to control demand and behavior. Once you let government regulate something, there is nothing to keep them from jacking up the fees to control the balance between supply and demand. If a state wants to give out less drivers licenses, all they have to do is jack up the fees. Of course they don't do it to something so popular as drivers licenses, they do it to building permits, alcoholic beverage licenses, and firearms licenses. For instance, under Bill Clinton, the BATFags began a crusade to drive gun dealers out of business. In addition to using any excuse not to grant an FFL, one of the first things they did was jack up the fees.
Voters are a fickle bunch. The same people that think private banks shouldn't be allowed to charge ATM fees for using their machines, are completely unphased when the government hikes the price of marriage licenses, car registration, or the local telephone service charges.
Ravenwood - 07/24/03 12:00 PM
LONDON (Reuters) -- As life goes, it doesn't get much better than for male Zeus bugs. The tiny water bugs that are common along Australia's east coast have an easy life. Their female partners provide free food, transport and unlimited sex whenever they want it.There are plenty of deadbeat hippies out there that live the same lifestyle. Zeus is the king of the Greek gods. What I want to know is why scientists didn't name this bug after Kato Kaelin or Tom Arnold, instead?
"All the advantages in this relationship seem to fall to the male with no obvious advantage for the female, yet the female Zeus bug seems a willing partner in this one-sided affair," Mark Elgar of the University of Melbourne in Australia said.Now that I think about it, how many women could say this about a few of their many relationships? I won't name any names, but
Ravenwood - 07/24/03 10:45 AM
I have to hand it to Jenn with two 'n's. Yesterday I was trying to figure out the name of a song I'd heard, and she was there to help. I didn't know any of the lyrics, and could hardly convey how it sounded, over internet chat. Basically, all she had to go on was that it was good to dance to, and that the guy sounded like an islander or something.
After only the second try, she correctly came up with Sean Paul singing "Get Busy".
Ravenwood - 07/24/03 10:30 AM
Fox News reports that the effort to recall Gray Davis has enough signatures to force a recall election. The California Secretary of State reported that the state wide tally of valid signatures had surpassed 1.3 Million, far more than the 897,158 required.
I'm going to go on the record and predict that the people of California will never get to vote on it. Once Davis exhausts all of his legal challenges, and realizes his fate, he'll resign. That would give the presiding Democrats the option of naming his successor. They'll make a big show of it, and Davis will say something like "For the good of California..". I seriously doubt Davis will give the voters the pleasure of tossing his ass out of office, and I know that the democrats don't want to lose the governorship. After all the legal appeals are exhausted, the only option to short circuit a recall would be for Davis to resign.
There is an outside chance that Davis will take a Plan B approach, and take his chances with the recall vote. If he loses, the Lt. Governor could just name himself governor. Of course, he would have to make that decision prior to the actual vote, to ensure that no candidates were allowed on the ballot. It's complex and politically risky, so don't look for it to happen. Davis will either try to win through the courts (the Way of the Democrat) or resign. I don't think the courts will risk the political backlash of breaking state election law, so look for the latter to happen. Either way, it won't be Arnold sitting up there in Sacramento.
Ravenwood - 07/23/03 03:05 PM
John Mays sent me this story about an interesting incident in his home town of Chattanooga. When police tried to stop 21-year-old John Nicholas Hood for a broken tail light, he leaped out of the car and ran into the woods. Hamilton County Sheriff's Deputies Henry Ritter and Richard Gough didn't have too much trouble getting the dimwitted suspect to come back out though.
The officers' calls to Hood went unanswered so Gough said they were sending a dog after him. Ritter started barking.The AP also notes that although Deputy Ritter barked at the suspect to get him to give himself up, he had no intention of biting him."He stood up and said, 'I'm here. Call off the dog,"' Ritter said.
Ravenwood - 07/23/03 11:00 AM
A Spanish town mayor has made it illegal for men to go out on Thursdays. While Reuters finds this humorous, I find it disturbing.
MADRID (Reuters) - The mayor of a southern Spanish town has declared Thursdays "ladies' night" and says he will fine any man found strolling about town in the evening, in an attempt to encourage them to stay at home and do the chores.Can you imagine a political figure in the United States making it illegal for anyone to go out on a certain night of the week? That is almost as disturbing as a United States Congressman telling a Californian that he's not welcome to visit Michigan. Oh wait, John Dingell already told Ward Connerly to "Go home and stay there, you're not welcome here."A spokeswoman for recently elected Andalusian regional party mayor, Javier Checa, said on Thursdays from October, the streets would be the preserve of the town's women and a five euro ($5.67) fine would be slapped on any man found out and about.
The men of Torredonjimeno, a town of 14,000 people in the olive-growing province of Jaen in Spain's southernmost region, were not impressed by the attempt to tie them to the kitchen sink.
"Who does the mayor think he is to fine me if I go to a bar?. I'll go to a bar on Thursday, and if they fine me I'll pay it...but we'll be seeing each other in court," resident Jose Damas told state television.
Ravenwood - 07/23/03 10:40 AM
Kevin highlights the anti-gun rhetoric in the NAACP gun lawsuit dismissal. If you are like me, and didn't have the time to look at the actual ruling, now you don't have to.
Related articles:
Judge dismisses gun lawsuit for all the wrong reasons - 07/22/2003
Ravenwood - 07/23/03 10:00 AM
The reaction from the far-left in response to Uday and Qusay Hussein being killed is pretty ignominious. Reknowned America hater Robert Fisk, who once blamed himself for being mugged by a band of Afghani thugs, doesn't think it was them at all.
So they are dead. Or are they? [...]Fisk wants us to believe that we ambushed 4 guys sitting around playing poker. Oh, and one of them was but a mere innocent child, caught in the murderous crossfire.The two men are said to bear an impressive resemblance to the brothers. A 14-year-old child killed by the Americans - one of the four dead - might be one of Saddam's grandsons.
Then there is New York Congressman, Charles Rangel. Rangel thinks that we broke the law by "assassinating" the Hussein boys.
"We have a law on the books that the United States should not be assassinating anybody. [...]These are, of course, plays right out of the ultra-left handbook. First, that the Husseins were just minding their own business, and second, that we are a big mean bully who is fighting an unfair war against and underdog enemy that couldn't even muster a defense."I personally don't get any satisfaction that it takes 200,000 troops, 250,000 troops, to knock off two bums."
Spoons has some nice scary reactions from the lefty-blogger crowd. Not only is there a question of the necessity of deleting the Hussein clan, but some are questioning the timing. Just when their partisan attacks were starting to take hold, Bush springs this trap on them. It was all part of the VRWC to discredit their demagoguery.
Ravenwood - 07/23/03 08:45 AM
The San Francisco Gate reports that some California Democrats accidentally left a microphone on during a closed door planning meeting. Just what were they planning? Prolonging California's budget crisis for political gain.
Some members of the group, including Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg, said if the budget crisis were extended, it could improve chances for a ballot initiative that would make it easier for the Democrats to raise taxes by lowering the threshold for passage from two-thirds to 55 percent.Is anyone really surprised? These are the same type of people that wished September 11th would have happened a year earlier, so that Slick Willie could have grabbed some political credit.
Ravenwood - 07/23/03 08:30 AM
My entry to Carnival 44 was accepted, and I've got my name in lights. Woohoo!
You can check out the Carnival over at Jonie's Joanie's.
Ravenwood - 07/22/03 06:18 PM
Why say anything, when you've got Scrappleface:
Saddam to Offer Eulogy at Sons' Funeral
(2003-07-22) -- Saddam Hussein may deliver the eulogy at a state funeral for his sons, Uday and Qusay, who died suddenly today in Mosul. The elder Hussein was invited to speak at the funeral by the commander of allied ground forces in Iraq, Army Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez."We understand the emotions triggered by the death of one's sons," said Lt. Gen. Sanchez. "So, we want Mr. Hussein to stand up there on the podium, in clear line of sight, and tell the world how special his boys were. We aim to give Saddam the respect due a leader of his caliber. I can assure you that he will have the full attention of many of our finest men."
The allied commander said Mr. Hussein's remarks would last "roughly 7.5 seconds, after which the former Iraqi leader, doubtless with a heavy heart, will return to an underground bunker."
Ravenwood - 07/22/03 06:06 PM
Muahahahaha.. The VRWC strikes le tower de Eiffel.
(photo via CNN)
CNN, by the way, will let you watch a video of the burning tower, if you give them $40.
(link via Bob the Bear)
Ravenwood - 07/22/03 04:20 PM
Although he may never get laid again, kudos to John Hawkins for sticking to his guns.
While I did have a few women on the list that I submitted, I must admit that they were a distinct minority. Perhaps he can do a list just for American women.
Let's see.. Marlyn Monroe, Pamela Anderson, Jennifer Aniston, Tanya Roberts.... Oops, sorry.. wrong list.
Ravenwood - 07/22/03 12:00 PM
Michele offers up chapter two of the PETA KFC chicken protest. Before it was just vandalism, now it's assault and battery.
Why should we put up with such home grown eco-terrorism sponsorship? I can only hope that armed troops are storming the PETA headquarters in Norfolk at this very moment. At the very least the CEO's body guards should have pummeled the every loving shit out of these thugs.
Ravenwood - 07/22/03 11:30 AM
"When something like this happens, you do think about the fact they were blind and wonder, but I believe that blindness - either in the child or the counselors - had nothing to do with this. There are many sighted children who also drown." -- Joyce Scanlan, executive director of Blind Inc., who is also blind. Scanlan claims that blindness has nothing to do with the drowing death of a blind child who was swimming with all blind councilors.
I guess if a man with no arms gets into an auto accident, she'd claim "The fact that he had no arms and was steering with his teeth had nothing to do with this. There are plenty of armed people who also get into auto accidents."
Ravenwood - 07/22/03 08:30 AM
Neal Boortz (second item) is taking the Democrats to task today for Dowdifying President Bush. In a campaign commercial in Minnesota, the Dems alter one of Bush's quotes to change the meaning, in the style of Maureen Dowd of the New York Times. Of course, Bush's actual statement is true:
"The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."This is something the Brits stand by to this very day. That doesn't stop Democrats from deleting a few words to completely change the meaning. Boortz reports that in the commercial, you only hear half the story.
"Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."This of course changes the entire meaning of the quote, and makes it sound like something that Bush is claiming instead of something that the British Government has learned. Then again, since when did they ever care about honesty. I guess a lie is a lie only when it comes from a Republican. And even then, even when it happens to be true.
Ravenwood - 07/22/03 08:00 AM
The NAACP had their lawsuit against the gun industry thrown out of court, but not before U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein ruled that gun retailers were responsible for the proliferation if illegal firearms. The AP reports on Weinstein's ruling:
The NAACP proved its members "did suffer relatively more harm from the nuisance created by the defendants through illegal availability of guns in New York," U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein wrote in a 175-page decision.While I'm pleased with the outcome, I cannot help but think that this federal judge is deliberately laying the foundation for more frivolous lawsuits against the gun industry. His personal bias certainly shone through, when he basically ruled that gun manufacturers and retailers are directly responsible for gun violence, but that it doesn't just affect black people, it affects all of us."It failed, however, to show that its harm was different in kind from that suffered by other persons in New York," Weinstein added. [...]
Manufacturers take too few measures, he wrote, "to eliminate or even appreciably reduce the public nuisance they individually and collectively have created." Among the "obvious steps," he said, would be requiring retailers to ban multiple sales to the same customers.
Of course, the notion is akin to blaming car dealerships and manufacturers for the proliferation of auto accidents stemming from high speed police chases. After all, if they didn't manufacture and sell so many cars, there wouldn't be as many to steal. You cannot blame the thief, because he's the victim of an oppressive and unfair capitalist society. So, lets blame the capitalists. Even if we lose in court, perhaps we can still drive them out of business.
I also love his handy solution to illegal gun violence. We'll just run right out and edit the Constitution to read "keep and bear arm" instead of "arms". That should keep guns out of the hands of criminals. What a jackass.
Of course, New York already tough city and state-wide gun control. That hasn't seemed to stop the proliferation of crime under Bloomberg's watch. In fact, Guiliani's method of crime control proved to be the most effective way to reduce crime. Under Rudy, criminals and gang bangers were rounded up for lesser crimes like vandalism, as a form of nipping them in the bud. It sounds easy, but it was effective. Bloomberg on the other hand, has the police so busy trying to generate revenue by ticketing smokers and people who sit on milk crates, that real crime is starting to run rampant.
UPDATE: Kim DuToit adds this gem quote from Sen. Frank Lautenberg, the NJ gun control democrat who shoved Torricelli aside last year.
"A federal judge has found that corrupt gun dealers are a menace to a safe, peaceful society," Mr. Lautenberg said. "Unfortunately, a legal technicality prevented the court from ruling against these reckless gun dealers."I would like to note that Lautenberg didn't let any legal "technicalities" stand in his way when he asked the New Jersey courts to break their state election laws during his 21 day Senate campaign.
Ravenwood - 07/22/03 07:38 AM
Ravenwood - 07/21/03 06:48 PM
For those of you that were too lazy to read my Chicken Soup for the Blogging Soul, here is a highlight that I liked:
Last Sunday in Virginia, I missed the commissioning of the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan. She looks like a good ship, and should help usher in the next wave of super carriers. The U.S.S. George H. W. Bush is right behind her, and should be the next carrier out of dry dock. Apparently, there may just be a U.S.S. George W. Bush in the works too. Hmm, I wonder why there is no U.S.S. Clinton. I wouldn't name a carrier after him, but perhaps a yellow submarine that's long, hard and full of seamen. (rimOkay, perhaps that was more of a lowlight.jober.. shot)
Ravenwood - 07/21/03 06:09 PM
"In France, it's a very healthy protest scene and very common for people to take to the streets to air their grievances. We went to a police station, we filled out a form, we'll pay a fine. That's it." -- Chrissie Hynde of The Pretenders, isn't "Back on the Chain Gang". She's expressing praise for the French police who arrested her and other PETA protesters for vandalizing a Paris KFC.
Hynde and other PETA protesters blocked traffic and vandalized the facade of the restaurant to protest the inhumane treatment of chickens. She was released after spending less than an hour in jail.
I wonder if she's interested in supporting Americans for Chicken Safety.
Ravenwood - 07/21/03 05:46 PM
The University of California is contemplating hiking tuition for "rich" folks. That means that students whose parents make more than $90,000 may be hit with a $3000 tuition surcharge.
California's premier university system is considering charging rich students more tuition to offset deep funding cuts resulting from the state's $38 billion budget deficit.The tuition hike would affect more than 58,000 of the 160,000 undergraduate students (more than 36%) in the nine university system.
Of course this is only the first step. You can bet that the $90,000 threshold won't hold up to inflation, and will gradually be expanded to include more and more students. After all, those rich kids can afford it. They don't "need" the money.
How long before you have to take your tax return in to purchase other government services? The DMV, post office, and any number of government agencies could start charging more to rich folks. Imagine having to pay $150 to get your drivers license, while your buddy only has to pay $40. Isn't there some Nordic country that hands out parking and traffic fines based on your "ability" to pay? Karl Marx would be proud.
Ravenwood - 07/21/03 03:30 PM
CNN is reporting that a handful of young liberals are making a run for the border. The Canadian border, that is. Fed up with the massive conservative shift, the biased right wing media, and the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy to dominate the globe, and control the world's oil supply, some liberals are packing up and leaving. Canada, the land of stiff gun control, sactuarires fo heroin addicts, government controlled health care, and the 50% income tax is seen as a liberal utopia for many.
CNN also brings up fond memories of the Vietnam draft, when commie pinkos and draft dodgers were moving northward in droves. Perhaps Charles Rangel was on to something when he said he wanted to bring back the draft. While many conservatives balked at Rangel's idea of weakening our military with an influx of conscripted liberals, I think it's a hell of an idea. Not only should we bring back the draft, but we should have separate buses set up at the draft office. One for shipping our guys to boot camp, and the other for shipping all the conscienscous objectors up to Canada. My only request is that they take Alec Baldwin with them.
Related articles:
New York Congressman Calls for Resuming Draft - 12/31/02
Ravenwood - 07/21/03 01:30 PM
Tony Martin, a UK farmer who removed a home invader from the gene pool, is still being given harsh treatment by the U.K. "justice" system. Martin is coming up for a mandatory parole, having served two thirds of his prison sentence. Normally prisoners are given a three day pass to get their affairs in order, and to transition them back into society, but Martin's was denied, because he is still seen as a "danger to burglars".
Back in May, the parole board denied Martin's early parole because of his lack of remorse for the home invading goblin. They contended that burglars who break into people's homes and attack them are "entitled to protection" from people like Martin.
Living in socialist Europe, Martin had no right to defend himself. He was supposed to pee himself, and hide under his bed while he waited for police to arrive to investigate his murder. Instead of allowing the goblin to kill him like a good socialist martyr, Martin decided to take his personal safety into his own hands. That's a big no-no in "civilized" societies such as the U.K., and it earned Martin hard time in the pokey.
(link via Spoons)
Related articles:
UK continues to champion criminal's rights - 06/16/2003
UK Parole Board concerned about "burglar's rights" - 05/12/2003
Ravenwood - 07/21/03 08:00 AM
Hawkins has put together another list. Actually, I helped with this one by submitting a list of names. I was surprised to see how many of my picks made it to the Top 20.
Well, go check out the list.
Ravenwood - 07/20/03 03:34 PM
When I switched to individually archived permalinks, I was a bit perturbed at how much diskspace the archives took up. It basically doubled the amount of disk space my web site gobbled up. I really started to become alarmed at how fast I was approaching my space limit.
My allotment is 150 MB. Before I made the switch, I had used a paltry 30 MB. Switching to individual archives instantly gobbled up 40 MB, and I was almost half way to my limit. Over the next few months, the disk usage climbed up to 120 MB. Part of that is because of the icons, and any images I've added, but most of it was due to the damned archives.
I took another look at my templates today, and decided to cut out the sidebar on the individual archives. Cutting the sidebar saves me over 20 MB of disk space. I don't like the inconsistency, but it was either that or buy more space from my hosting provider. I guess I could restore the sidebar, but that would mean using frames or something else equally dreaded. I think I'll probably get used to the new look of the individual pages. Still, even though it bought me some time, it's obviously only a temporary solution. Right now I'm still using about 100 MB.
Ravenwood - 07/20/03 11:49 AM
Is this just a shameless ploy, or a losers club?
When I look over at my blogroll, I see that there are a whole lot more people out there not blogrolled by Ravenwood, than not blogrolled by Glenn. I guess it's all a matter of priorities.
Ravenwood - 07/20/03 11:30 AM
Wouldn't you just love to know which Homer Advice Quote you are? This one didn't really come as a surpise considering my "What Simpson's character are you" result was you know who.
You're the lusty, drunken, party type. Booze, and members of the opposite sex are pretty much all you think about. While your party attitude may land you some fun and all, it could also get you into some trouble. Not to mention the fact that you annoy the hell out of some people with your drunken desires.
(Hat tip to Gennie)
Ravenwood - 07/19/03 05:30 PM
After 14 grueling days, working 14+ hour days and studying late into the night, I emerged from my training class weary and tired. Still, I managed to accumulate a 7-0 record on the exams, and walk away with my MCSA and MCSE certifications. Our entire class did extremely well, with 8 of 11 people passing everything the first time, and two more only having to re-take one exam. A nod goes out to my instructor.
I also want to thank Lope for taking the reins from me while I was taking my training class. Had I not been able to leave my weblog in his capable hands, I probably would not have been able to pass the class. Instead of using those lunch breaks and spare moments to study the next chapter, I would have undoubtedly been busy trying to publish a quick weblog entry.
I did however, manage to save a few bookmarks. I tucked away articles and stories that I really wanted to talk about. I saved them all up, for what I'm calling the "Longest Entry Ever" or "The Week(s) in Review" or "Chicken Soup for the Blogging Soul".
In blogging news, I missed Spoon's big comeback. I had a feeling he might be up to something when he left this cryptic message on my web-site. Oddly enough, Spoons added me to his blogroll right before he went on hiatus, and removed me from it right after he returned. Mrs. DuToit also put me on her blogroll, right when she started her hiatus, and her hiatus started right around the time Spoons came back from his. Both Spoons and DuToit have the same number of letters. Spoons lives in Chicago, and Mr. DuToit used to. Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Is Spoons really Mrs. DuToit? Hmm... Inquiring minds want to know.
Speaking of Ohio, (okay, I wasn't, but I needed a segue) on Tuesday, I read about the city of Cincinnati going all 1984 on people's asses. Up go the cameras, which should make for some good "Stupid behavior caught on tape" videos. Ironically, Cincinnati lawmakers are Ohio's biggest opponents to allowing law abiding citizens the right to carry concealed firearms. It just goes to show you that they would much rather spend government money to investigate your murder, than to allow you to have prevented it in the first place.
Meanwhile, Fox News featured an AP story about a West Virginia man that went nuts at a school board meeting. He doused a man with gasoline, and opened fire with an "AK-47 assault rifle", because some people were smoking around him. I'm sure the pleasure police liberals will be falling all over themselves to try to ban cigarettes, AK-47s and gasoline from school board meetings.
Kim gives us a story about Massachusetts gun registration. It seems as though the police agency in charge of processing registration requests simply decided not to do it any more. The sheriff blamed budget cuts and imposed a moratorium on all new gun purchases. Thankfully, the town council had the sense to tell the sheriff he had to do his job, regardless of the budget. Hopefully this will be a wakeup call for citizens to tear down registration barriers once and for all.
In another gun registration story, Kim notes that the U.N. may be pushing for world wide gun confiscation registration. Specifically, they want to wield power over the citizens of the United States and our lawless, freedom loving ideas. All I'll say is that it isn't going to happen. Not to my guns any way.
Speaking of gun bans, one of these days, the citizens of Washington D.C. may finally get their rights back. The Post reports that Senator Orrin Hatch has proposed legislation to end the gun ban. Despite having a handgun ban and a longgun ban/registration scheme in place since 1976, Washington D.C. is the murder capital of the United States.
Speaking of murder capitals, the violent crime rate in England is still on the rise. Despite passing a sweeping gun ban in the late 1990s, overall violent crime is up 20%. Murders in London jumped 22%, while "gangland" crime has skyrocketed 72%. Gee, you make guns illegal, and prosecute homeowners for defending themselves, and look what happens. Go figure.
Speaking of guns, Kim has yet another good one about the age old argument between the .45 ACP vs. the 9mm Europellet. I've always thought size mattered, and for that reason, I don't own a wimpy 9mm. If I do buy a 9mm, it'll be something that like this mean and nasty Cobray M11, that is sure to drive fear into gun grabbers everywhere.
In other gun news, Taranto pointed out this tidbit of media bias. Journalists at the Olympian (Washington) are shocked, just shocked, to discover that gun owners can actually get together for some friendly competition and not end up killing each other in "Dodge City" fashion. Their headline: "Despite presence of guns, friendliness abounds at state championships" says it all, and makes me wonder about the mental stability of their reporters.
Speaking of media bias, Eugene Volokh caught CBS in not one, but two flaps about Iraq. I guess when you can't find any bad news, you just have to make it up sometimes.
While I'm thinking about Iraq, dems are acting like they've found the Rosetta stone with George Bush's state of the union address. Even though they voted to go to war months prior to the speech, Dems are claiming they were duped by the "bad" intelligence info. Desperate for a campaign issue, presidential wannabes like Kerry and Graham have been giving pointing the finger at Bush and his deceptive yet persuasive fifteen words that retroactively convinced them that attacking Iraq was the only option. They never would have voted to attack Iraq if they had known that the 15 words Bush interjected into his speech three months later were going to end up being false.
So distraught were some democrats, that they forgot all about the NAALCP's convention. After some harsh words from the race warlords however, dems were quick to Step'n Fetchit. They would have garnered more respect (and kept their spine) had they used this excuse instead.
Speaking of racial warmongering, Kim DuToit notes that the Congressional Black Caucus is upset because Bush didn't invite them to go to Africa. Kim notes that "perhaps if you stopped referring to the President as a moron, or as a right-wing fundamentalist, or as someone owned by Big Oil or Enron, or as someone who allowed 9/11 to happen so he could enrich his family -- perhaps if you stopped doing all those things, he might actually care about what you think."
Back at the NAALCP convention, Bob Graham, who is no doubt a product of government schools, noted that he would "use the five-letter word: deceit" to describe the Bush Administration. I wouldn't normally grandstand over such a trivial mistake, if it weren't for dickheads like Jacob Weisberg. The "Bushism" crowd, who tape every Bush event, in hopes that he'll stumble over a syllable or two, were eerily silent. What, no book of Grahamisms?
Speaking of the product of government schools, the top item on the PC Watch list are parents of an Oregon school system that want the schools to stop flying the American Flag. One of those who would be offended by the flag is Tracy Bungay, who whines, "I want to raise my children to be citizens of the world, and the flag does not represent ideals I want to instill ... It represents dominance, greed, corporate power and not freedom." Too bad state law requires the flag be flown. Perhaps Tracy can use her school voucher to put her children into a private school. Oh wait, she's probably against school vouchers too. Oh well, deal with it, Tracy.
Tracy may not understand what freedom means, but the Iraqis sure do. Over in the gulf, the fall of Saddam's regime has been made an official Iraqi holiday. I'm sure this is driving the peacenik's absolutely crazy. They could only be more pissed off if the Iraqi's started calling it George Bush Day.
In other war news, Puggs over at Random Nuclear Strikes finally got around to watching Gods and Generals. He seemed to enjoy the movie, but claims that his Yankee blood could feel empathy for the "confederate men, but not their cause, not their passion for the war that was to come." So just what did he feel empathy for, if not the cause or passion of men defending their homeland from invasion? Perhaps it was just indigestion he was feeling.
Meanwhile, in state news, the Rhode Island state police have declared war on the natives over cigarette sales taxes. First the white man stole their land and used their images as sport's mascots, and now they cannot even sell tobacco (which is a truly Native American product) without paying tribute to the man. If anything, we should be paying Native Americans for giving us the wonderful product that is tobacco. I wish the Narragansett Indian Tribe the best of luck in federal court. Those yankee pleasure police droogs need to be taken down a peg or two.
I really had to bite my tongue when I read about the Nevada Supreme Court overturning their own Constitution. Apparently the Nevada constitution mandates that school funding be taken care of, and that tax increases be passed by two-thirds majority. Lawmakers discovered that by diverting budgetary funds away from the school budget, they could try to push through a tax increase under the constitutional provision protecting school funding. The question that comes to mind is how mandating a simple majority is any more constitutional than a two-thirds majority. Well, it could have been worse. At least they didn't use the words "compelling interest". Augh, you know this is all her fault.
Last Sunday in Virginia, I missed the commissioning of the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan. She looks like a good ship, and should help usher in the next wave of super carriers. The U.S.S. George H. W. Bush is right behind her, and should be the next carrier out of dry dock. Apparently, there may just be a U.S.S. George W. Bush in the works too. Hmm, I wonder why there is no U.S.S Clinton. I wouldn't name a carrier after him, but perhaps a yellow submarine that's long, hard and full of seamen. (rim job er.. shot)
In other national news, the AP notes that the RIAA has won hundreds of federal subpoenas against music fans. I find it most interesting that the ISPs that are being targeted for enforcement, are in direct competition with RIAA members like TWAOL. Verizon and Comcast users have been hit the hardest, neither of whom also has a music business division. Meanwhile, even though they are the nation's largest ISP, not a single AOL user has been served with one of the 871 federal subpoenas.
Fox News brought us the sob story of former college students that are stuck with "high interest" loans. Apparently we've gotten to the point where 6.45% is "high interest". Oh woe is Gene Riccoboni, a New York lawyer who is prevented by the government from locking in his taxpayer subsidized loan at the low 3% rates that are common among today's student loans. You know, with seven years (or more) of college, you'd think he would have learned the difference between FIXED and VARIABLE rates. You don't see me crying to Ford Motor Company because I'm locked in at the ludicrously high rate of 4.9% on my car loan. Gene, you always have the option of trying to find non-government subsidized financing in the private sector. You could always walk down to the bank and ask them for a 3% personal loan. (Good luck with that!)
There has been a lot of good offbeat news lately. Last Thursday, I sent out an email about a nice South Carolina girl I'd found. She has a few skeletons in her car.. er closet, but at least I don't have to worry about her running off. About a week later, my cousin's wife asked me about this mysterious new girlfriend I had. I guess cynicism is lost on some people.
In a rare bit of journalistic humor, Reuters featured a truly bizarre story about a Swiss rent-a-cow service. Apparently the cows are rented out for their milk production and cheese. I wonder if PETA has a European branch?
In other offbeat news, On the Fritz featured this truly bizarre story about the tracking of rubber duckies. Ahh, our scientific dollars hard at work.
In related scientific news, the mystery of Van Gogh's Moonrise has finally been solved. This has long been one of my favorite paintings. Scientists, not wanting to squander a perfectly good government grant, have calculated the precise time and day that Van Gogh would have created such a masterpiece. On July 13th, 1889 at 9:08 PM local time, Vincent Van Gogh forever immortalized a ridge of the French countryside. We can all rest better, now that they've cleared that up.
In other French news, actor Johnny Depp, known for his roles in Private Resort and Cry-Baby, plans to make Paris his permanent home. The Seattle PI reports that Depp says that the United States "mortifies" him with its "childish freedom fries and freedom toast." Depp also campaigned for the "Father of the Year" award by noting that if his kids ever wanted to smoke pot, he'd go get it for them. After watching his friend River Phoenix go dance with the devil in the cold moon light, Depp doesn't trust street drugs anymore, because they could easily be laced with other substances. Ahh, another liberal, doing it "for the children".
France's ally, those pesky Iraqi guerrillas, are going to have to suffer through their shortage of white flags. France has ruled out sending troops to Iraq.
Also in France, cyclist Lance Armstrong, who is trying to win his fifth Tour de France in a row was held up by some French anti-globalization nutjobs. Taranto linked this SI article, and noted that only in France could a political protest that stopped a bike race be deemed "a normal race incident."
In other sporting news, Tazteck notes that home town hero Maurice Clarett may be getting more than just tutoring. Apparently communications is a harder major than it looks like, and the star running back may have taken drastic measures to make it to the Tostito'stm Fiesta Bowl last year. I'll hold my judgement until the facts are in, but I've taken classes with student athletes that seemed to never show up, yet always still managed to pass.
And of course there's Kobe. Kobe Bryant was charged with felony sexual assault. I'm not sure what to make of athletes who get in trouble with girls. On the one hand, there are plenty of women out there who would love to trap an athlete in this exact situation, in hopes of getting a huge settlement. On the other hand, there are plenty of grab-ass athletes out there that think they can get away with murder. (cough) OJ (cough)
Well, that brings me to the end of a long post. If you made it down this far, congratulations. Give yourself a gold star for attentiveness. Happy hour is rolling around, and somewhere there is a beer with my name on it. Salud.
Lope - 07/19/03 04:27 PM
Ravenwood will resume regular blogging today. Thanks for reading: I may post very unoccasionally in the future. My immediate plans are to kick my poker habit and resume my normal (web) programming schedule.
Lope - 07/19/03 01:00 AM
DraftClark2004 has this fascinating story about Dwight Eisenhower:
"America has seen many draft movements in its history. One notable effort involved Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952:
Draft Eisenhower movements had sprung up in both parties in 1948 and again during 1951. Eisenhower had done his best to ignore them.
In late December President Truman wrote to ask General Eisenhower, "I wish you would let me know what you intend to do," and General Eisenhower replied, "I do not feel that I have any duty to seek a political nomination."
Before too long, however, General Eisenhower reconciled his commitment not to seek a political office by taking the position that he would be personally compelled to respond if called to a higher duty. On January 6, 1952, Henry Cabot Lodge forced the issue by entering Eisenhower in the New Hampshire Republican primary without Eisenhower's authorization ... General Eisenhower won all the Republican delegates and soundly defeated Senator Taft (who had campaigned intensively in the state) by a vote of 50% to 38%.
Announcing that he was "astounded" and "moved" by the results, Eisenhower told a reporter, "Any American who would have that many other Americans pay him that compliment would be proud or he would not be an American." Convinced of being called to a higher duty, he announced his candidacy the next day.
-- Courtesy of the Eisenhower Institute Web site"
Lope - 07/19/03 12:47 AM
The CEO and Founder of my company ordered a bunch of copies of Seth Godin's Purple Cow. He gave them to all the department heads today and told us to have then read them by next Wednesday. It didn't take me long to figure out this book was nothing like Harold and The Purple Crayon, my son's favorite book.
Being something of a speed reader, I'm just about through with the book and will report that it is a great read. Seth Godin makes the point that to be a very successful business, one must now be REMARKABLE.
In the Golden Age of TV Advertising, companies thunked up a product, built a factory and advertised on TV. TV advertising drove product sales which generated profits that went back into TV advertising. The cycle got bigger and bigger and products could be branded for a long time. All good things must come to an end, however..
Because of the pervasion of mass advertisement, consumers now successfully block out most attempts to reach them.
Seth successfully uses the research of other marketing gurus to provide us with a bell curve that shows the name of the game is to now be REMARKABLE enough to grab the attention of Early Adopters who will influence a larger buying segment that is ignoring mass advertising.
The downside is a shorter product life cycle. Why? Because its hard to maintain the REMARKABLE aspect of a product or service. Something better or more clever will invariably come along.
Purple Cow throws out the P's of marketing and shows businesses how to market to a nation raised and jaded on traditional marketing.
Lope - 07/19/03 12:21 AM
Terry Jeffrey set a personal record tonight on Hardball when he was able to excoriate liberals on every single question posed by fill-in host Mike Barnicle. Jeffrey managed to sock it to liberals on a wide range of questions covering topics as diverse as Bush's handling of the peace in Iraq, Hollywood's glamorizing of smoking and whether or not Senior Citizens should be allowed to drive.
His last liberal strawman was so convoluted that Jeffrey himself broke into what appeared to be an embarassed grin, although frequent watchers of Hardball know the Republican apologist is incapable of such emotion.
How do these clowns get regular TV appearances? The "blame the liberals" schtick is now a parody of itself and should immediately discredit the speaker.
"Touched By An Angel" was cancelled when its last viewer succombed to old age. How much longer until the old conservatives that comprise cable opinion-TV's base demographic die and free up the wires for intelligent discourse?
Lope - 07/18/03 01:47 AM
Do Dogs Bark The Same In Different Countries?
MSN knows how to get me to click through their web-site. These are the kinds of questions that intrigue me: trivial or nonsensical on the surface but perhaps more complex beneath the surface.
My initial answer is YES.
I read somewhere once there is a simple answer to every question and it is invariably the wrong answer. Of course, that seems to run contrary to Occham's Razor, SO..
NOW I'VE GOT TO CLICK THE LINK AND FIND OUT.
Alas, I still don't know. I lost my sound when I was reconfiguring the network a few days ago and haven't had time to troubleshoot it what with my new poker addiction and all.. can someone click the link and report back?
Lope - 07/18/03 01:17 AM
Four months to the day after sending this letter, Rep. Henry Waxman still has not received a response from the White House. I'm no expert on these things but to diss a Congressman - an elected representative of The People - seems to indicate an extraordinary degree of hubris on the part of the Bush administration.
Before you jump on me, Dear Republitarian, let me state that I realize Waxman is a Democrat, a liberal and probably a closet Socialist and a gun-grabber too, but he speaks for his constituents. Doesn't this mean anything anymore? Do lies and cover-ups only count against you if you are a Democrat? I watched the G-Man spinning this story on Hardball w/ Chris Matthews and I felt sorry for him. He seemed embarassed to have to trot out technicalities and hedges.
Time to drag Ken Starr out of storage, give him 20 million dollars and a mandate to find something. anything..
Lope - 07/17/03 11:25 PM
Hunting For Bambi has made headlines recently on the web and on TV. Snopes thinks the whole thing is probably a publicity stunt to sell videos.
One telling fact reported on Snopes:
"..in common with most web-based business hoaxes, the Hunting for Bambi site displays a curious lack of contact information. Its putative parent company, Real Men Outdoor Productions, is indeed a registered Nevada corporation, but that in itself doesn't mean much, as anyone can register a business for a small fee. (The address listed for Real Men Outdoor Productions corresponds to the address of another registered Las Vegas company, Clean Your Carpets Inc., whose corporate status has since been revoked.) Perhaps more significant is that no business address or phone number is to be found on the Hunting for Bambi site, and several readers who expressed interest in booking a "hunt" have told us their e-mail inquiries to the Hunting for Bambi folks went unanswered. Those are rather odd business practices for a legitimate company looking to book customers at $10,000 a pop."
I wanna be outraged by the whole tawdry affair but seeing women run around naked in the woods reminds me of that Caveman movie Darryl Hannah was in and that reminds me.. well, you know. Mhmm.
Lope - 07/17/03 11:11 PM
If you're a big Billy Bob Thornton fan, you've prolly seen "Daddy And Them". I'm not much of a movie watcher, preferring news and sports. I saw "Daddy And Them" last night (while I was playing poker) on one of the movie channels and was moved. Billy Bob Thornton is effortless. Andy Griffith turned in a brilliant performance. Laura Dern was awesome. Kelly Preston was unrecognizable.
I'm always amazed at how quickly a Billy Bob Thornton role can pull me in. One minute you think "Hey, its the actor with the country accent.." and the next minute the movie is over and you're shaking your head, "Wow". My wife saw Slingblade for the first time the other night and didn't even realize the protagonist was Billy Bob Thornton.
Of course, not everyone is a Billy Bob fan. Ravenwood told me "If Monster's Ball was the sequel to Monster's Inc., it sucked big time."
Lope - 07/17/03 10:47 PM
A coupla weeks ago, my boss (V.P./Director Of Operations) came into my office and asked me if we'd seen the Travel Channel's World Poker Tour broadcasts. I had, of course. My wife and I have been hooked on the series for few months.
Mike and his wife have gotten hooked on the show too. Mike took it further and logged on to a Poker internet site to play. He then made us all log on and play one night. Since then, I've been hooked. I don't do anything anymore except play online Poker.
I WAS programming/writing Stratego for the web, Game 2 in my Nostalgia Gaming Series. (Game 1 was Scrabble. Game 3 is going to be King Oil - anyone remember THAT gem?) I WAS working on some database stuff for my department. I WAS managing my time well.
Now I just play Poker. At home. At work. Today, I called my boss' extension and got his voice mail. I said, "Mike, I need to talk to you about a problem: I've got a pair of kings with an Ace kicker on the flop. I'd like to think my kings are best but one of my opponents bet on the flop so I think he may have Aces. What should I do? Please get back to me quick, it's my turn to bet !"
Come play Poker with me at Pokerroom.com.
Lope - 07/17/03 10:23 PM
Orrin Hatch recently proposed changing the Constitution (Article 2/Section 1) to allow naturalized citizens to hold the office of President, no doubt paving the way for President Schwarzenegger. This change is probably long overdue despite the motivations behind it. (Ending Presidential term limits is also long overdue. Republicans gave them to us, maybe now they'll end 'em for us.)
Orrin Hatch is one of my favorite right-wingers. Most times, he remains above the partisan fray and takes the amiable, plain-spoken approach. He understands what its like to be on the outside, always failing in his Presidential bids to be recognized as a "real" Christian by millions of activist religious conservatives who view Mormonism as a cult.
And he's also a prodigious song writer. Check out his music here.
Lope - 07/16/03 03:47 PM
A recurring theme of the blogs I visit seems to be DISGRUNTLEMENT - and there's nothing wrong with this. I only point it out to spotlight the difference in my own (weak) blogging. I'm bemused about most things, rarely disgruntled. I live a blessed life; life-long friends with whom I still keep in touch, a career I enjoy at a company I *LOVE*, a smart and successful wife who has borne me two healthy beautiful children, relatively good personal health. (My buddy Bill says that perfect health is the slowest rate at which one dies, so I'm dying slower than he is.)
The highlight of my day is right before bedtime when I look in on my sleeping children. Kasey usually sleeps like her mother, on her back, arms straight out beside her (a position that is easily mistaken for death.) Zane is a small boy in a relatively large bed, so finding him is the trick. If he's not in the bed, he's under it. He likes to sleep on his side. Last night, I took pictures of them sleeping and post them here for your viewing pleasure.
Lope - 07/15/03 09:48 PM
One of my favorite sites on the Web is the CIA's Home Page for Kids. Sure its sounds frightening and is a pitiful waste of taxpayer's money but where else on the internet can kids get the positive message to SAY NO TO DRUGS and GET HIGH ON INTELLIGENCE?
I mean from the CIA.. where else on the internet can you get this message from the CIA? Exactly.
Lope - 07/15/03 09:26 PM
Showing more religious fervor than class, per usual, Pat Robertson embarasses Virginia again. Pat is wasting good praying power on politics when we're plumb in the middle of Hurricane Season. (although Southeastern Virginia has natural hurricane protection. Its called North Carolina.)
Pat, turn to Matthew 6 where Christ is in the middle of the Sermon on the Mount.
Matthew 6: 5 - 8
"And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are; for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do; for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
Be not ye therefore like unto them for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him."
Lope - 07/15/03 07:39 PM
Joe Conason points out a quote from George Bush that the rest of the liberal press missed yesterday:
"We gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in."
I can see how this would cause some to question the veracity of the President's statements. I can even see how some folks would become a little scared what with the President not being aware of the events leading to his preemptive invasion of Iraq.
My personal feeling is that Bush is setting up the Reagan Defense as used in the Arms For Hostages scandal - Pretend You Don't Have Any Idea What Was Going On. I could take the easy shot here and say that shouldn't be hard but I won't. Oh well, I just did.
Now, for those of you that don't trust a steenkin' liberal Clinton flack like Joe Conason, go watch the video for yourselves. It's the video link titled "President Reaffirms Strong Position on Liberia".
Lope - 07/15/03 01:11 AM
Leave it to Salon.com to make a case for Telemarketing. Here's one paragraph:
"Telemarketing is an enormous business that hires millions of people and contributes to billions in commerce every year, but it is suddenly reeling under what insiders describe as a politically expedient bit of regulation. It surprises and offends telemarketers that, of all the scourges we suffer, lawmakers made this one a priority. Telemarketing is an annoyance, but that's all it is, people in the industry insist. Unsolicited sales calls won't give you cancer or heart disease or make you fat. Telemarketing doesn't damage the environment. It doesn't cause car accidents. Telemarketers don't hurt kids or animals. They aren't suspected of harboring weapons of mass destruction. Yet politicians of every stripe are united behind the issue, and they've come up with a solution -- the do-not-call list -- that experts say will devastate telemarketing."
The article goes on to quote these questionable statistics:
"On average, says Searcy of the American Teleservices Association, an American household makes three purchases per year in response to sales calls. In 2001, according to the WEFA Group, telemarketing purchases represented 4 percent of all sales to consumers in the United States, an enormous slice of economic activity. Before the imposition of the do-not-call list, WEFA estimated that by 2006, about $403 billion in sales would be made by telemarketers."
Having NEVER made a purchase from a telemarketer in twenty years and only being slammed by a phone company once (Sprint), I don't see how these numbers can be correct. Or to extrapolate it, if 60 million Americans are expected to sign up on the DO NOT CALL list by October 1st, presumably because they DON'T buy from telemarketers, how much stuff must the other millions of Americans be buying? And if this is the case, how many calls must these folks endure a day?? Don't bother with the math. Since these are industry numbers, they're probably inflated.
The new legislation goes further than a DO NOT CALL list, tho..
"The commission ordered telemarketers to set their predictive dialers to "abandon" -- that is, hang up on -- no more than 3 percent of the calls made, and it prohibits call centers from masking their phone numbers from caller I.D. devices, which has been a common practice in the industry.""
Typically, I'm tied in conflicting knots after reading the article. I want to err on the side of free-enterprise and capitalism but it occurs to me that free-enterprise gave us the institution of slavery which ultimately required Gov't intervention. Or, hmm.. if owning a phone isn't a right, then no one has the right to call you on the phone. Hell, I dunno. Comments are welcome - no, comments are required!
Lope - 07/14/03 06:39 PM
"More and more African-Americans are beginning to think for themselves." - Dick Armey, former Republican House Majority Leader, today on MSNBC.
Ravenwood - 07/13/03 07:22 PM
Lope - 07/13/03 01:26 AM
Let's help Susan Smith find a man she deserves. As someone who does a lot of hiring, I can advise Susan that she just needs to prettify her resume. Any of the following phrases should have her drowning in love in no time:
"Great With Kids - For The First Couple Years Or So"
"Post-Delivery Abortion Specialist - Will Relocate to State with Lax Murder Laws"
"Christian - The Old Testament-Stone-The-Whole-Family-Kind"
It's a shame Jeffrey Dahmer got shiv'ed. They'd make the perfect pair. She could kill 'em and he could eat 'em.
Lope - 07/13/03 01:03 AM
This weekend, General Wesley Clark will be on This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Click here for show times.
This could be the EVENT Clark fans have been waiting for. Do the moderate thing and go sign the online petition to draft Clark.
Lope - 07/13/03 12:48 AM
A Twenty Dollar Donation can make you a card-carrying ACLU member. The horror-stricken looks you will get in the red states is by itself worth the money. Not enough fun? Then buy your favorite Christian Conservative a membership !
.. all joking aside, the ACLU performs a valuable service for unpopular causes across the political spectrum. Its a shame their web-site only focuses on their efforts against right-wingers. But I do understand why..
Lope - 07/13/03 12:16 AM
I'm back online again. Friday afternoon/evening my wife saw a Cox Cable van around the corner. I visited with the data tech and explained the lightning strike and let him know the node was working and the problem was likely with the boxes between the houses. Being the conscientious worker he is, he troubleshooted at my neighbor's house for a few more hours before making the call to the field maintenance guys, who can do work on the boxes.
They showed up Saturday around noon and told me it would be working when they left. When I got home again around 2pm, it was working - well, ONE of my systems was working. The other system wouldn't pull an IP from Cox. I'm paying for a coupla extra IPs. Tried another network card. No luck. Unpacked and hooked up the router, released IP from one working system and renewed with router. Hooked systems up to router. Bingo.
Will call and cancel extra IPs with Cox. I didn't cancel my Saturday night appointment with Cox. I wish I woulda been here to let them know it was working now. I hate Cox.
Lope - 07/11/03 04:54 PM
It appears that the purveyor of "Jesus Was a Liberal" T-shirts at Stupid Conservatives.com was shaped in much the same manner, religiously-speaking, as I was. Click here for his explanation of why he developed the T-shirt. I grew up the son of missionaries in a series of fundementalist churches. Some of the things I heard preached from The Word Of God:
- Genesis Chapter 1 details how blacks and whites are different species and should therefore not marry.
- Hannah's story in the Old Testament and the Book of Timothy in the New Testament show women are subservient to men and are cursed by God to have babies (from the original sin) and should stay out of leadership positions over men.
- The AntiChrist will be/is a Jew.
- Destruction of the world foretold in Revelations will occur in our lifetime.
- If I don't attend church regularly, my marriage will break-up.
- God will kill me for not being "right with him".
I could go on and on but you get the picture. As children we were also threatened with abandonment in the form of rapture if we weren't "saved", and imminent torture by communists (who would be taking over America any day) if we were "saved". Tough choice, huh?
When you vote Republican, you are empowering the people whose view of America is some sort of Zionist-type latter-day Israel that will be accorded or refused blessings from God depending on how many babies we abort or homosexuals we tolerate. The America you are helping these people create is not an America you want to live in, Dear Republiterian.
Ravenwood - 07/10/03 10:00 PM
You recruit a blogsitter to sit for your blog while you are away. The internet gods get angry, and smite his internet connection. What do you do?
Easy, you visit Rob and steal one of his posts for some quick blogage. He's been on a quiz rampage lately, so this should be pretty quick. Lets see how I do on some of the questions from the Naturalization test.
I'm not sure if Rob wrote this test or not, because some of the questions repeat, and the numbering is all out of order.
1. According to the constitution, a person must meet certain requirements in order to be eligible to become president. Name one requirement.I didn't look up to see if I got all the answers right, but I bet I'm closer than most. Who thinks I'll get hate mail for my answer to number 20?
You have to be at least 35 years old.2. Can the Constitution be changed?
Yes. The Constitution has an Amendment process, whereby the Legislative branch passes the changes, and the states ratify them.3. Can you name the 13 original states?
Yes. (That was easy)4.Can you name the two senators from your state?
Yes. (another easy one.)5. For how long do we elect each senator?
Most senators serve 25 or 30 years. Some seem to serve for 40 or 50. Technically they are elected to only 6 year terms, but with the passage of the Incumbent Protection Act, whereby you cannot criticize a sitting senator 60 days before he comes up for re-election, it is pretty much a lifetime term.6. For how long do we elect the president?
We don't. The President is elected by the members of the electoral college. He serves for four years. The electors are chosen by the states, via popular election, so technically we have a hand in the process. But we really don't.7. For how long do we elect the Representatives in Congress?
Two years, but the Incumbent Protection Act still applies.8. How many amendments to the Constitution have been made so far?
Twenty Seven.9. How many branches are there in our government?
Three.10. How many changes or Amendments to the Constitution are there?
See number 8.11. How many members are there in the Supreme Court? What is the term of office for these judges?
Nine. They serve for life, or until they retire.12. How many Presidential electors does each state have?
They have an elector for each House Representative, with a minimum of three.13. How many representatives are there in Congress?
435.14. How many Senators are there in Congress?
One Hundred.15. How many states are there in the union?
Who the hell cares? There were 13 Confederate States, and that is all you need to know. (Some people say 11, they are wrong).16. How many states are there in the US?
Fifty.17.How many stripes are there on the flag?
Thirteen.14. How many Supreme Court justices are there?
Nine. See question 11.15. How many terms can a president serve?
Two full terms.16. How many times may a congressman be reelected?
As many times as he can win.16. How many times may a senator be reelected?
Same.17. In what month do we vote for the president?
November.18. In what month is the new president inaugurated?
January.19. In what year was the Constitution written?
1788. (I think?)20. Name one amendment that guarantees or addresses voting rights?
Fourteenth, Fifteenth, the dreaded Seventeenth, and the very dreaded Nineteenth.
UPDATE: In looking at Mrs. DuToit's list of questions, it's no wonder that Peter Jennings waited so long to become a citizen.
Lope - 07/10/03 09:06 PM
I've been without home internet service since a thunderstorm came through about 30 hours ago. I've called Cox about a dozen times now. The first few calls they just blew me off saying they were a lot of outages in my area. This morning, I called from work (after I posted saying I was going to do such - see below) and the nice lady determined there were no more outages in my area, meaning I had a problem that required dispatched service. The earliest they have available is Saturday night between 6 and 8 pm. I explained if they'd taken my problem seriously the first few calls, I'd have a sooner appointment scheduled already. She was unmoved and told me *I Could Call Them* periodically to see if a cancellation had opened up an earlier spot.
I do not have landline phone service so without Cox's lousy service, I have no service at all. When I got home from work this evening, I called back in something of a controlled fury. I was made to step through resetting my modem for the umpteenth time. Long story short (too late, eh?) I wound up talking to a Supervisor who told me there was no earlier time available for dispatched service. I tried to impress upon him the nature of my problem: 200+ dollars a month for internet/digital TV/scads of premium channels/extra IP adresses and no back up internet.
He was unmoved. I will be down for 4 days. He did offer me a month's service credit and I can't tell you how grateful I am to know I'm not paying for nothing.
After I got off the phone with Cox, I decided to walk across the street to use my brother-in-law's internet. What do I find when I get here? He has Cox cable modem service and it's working GREAT! He's also a network guy so together we took his cable modem back to my place and tried it outside where the cable comes into the front of the house, bypassing two splitters. Still won't come online. Tried it in the backyard where the main cable line comes from the cable pedestal behind the yard. Still won't come online.
We know the node is working because his service is fine. This means the problem is in the pedestal behind our fence. (squarish green box about 2 feet high.) My brother-in-law told me my situation will only get worse and described this scenario: On Saturday evening, Cox will dispatch a contractor out to fix the problem and they will determine it is the pedestal (as we did). Then they will tell me they can't work on them and will have to schedule a COX EMPLOYEE who can work on it. This will take another couple of days. He said I can try calling Cox back to let them know it's the pedestal but they likely won't act on my information.
Now.. we all know the cable company is a pseudo-monopoly. Libertarians are okay with monoplies. (I know this from my youthful days flirting with libertarianism.) Someone tell me how the Libertarian solution will make all my problems go away. Or does the libertarian case have us so awash in cash from not paying taxes and so stoned on readily-available drugs that we spend our evenings target shooting with our automatic rifles and rampaging through the neighborhood in our Abrams' tanks not caring a whiff about internet service or who owns the cable company or even who owns America. Yah, its a cheap shot, but I've had a rough day.. and its going downhill quickly.
Lope - 07/10/03 09:48 AM
The Free State Project group already has an uphill battle finding a state to hijack, in large part due to their own hypocrisy. Organizers had an "Escape to New Hampshire" getaway weekend at a New Hampshire State Park, which wouldn't even exist if Free Staters ran the state. (This is like one of those time-travelling paradoxes.)
But it just seems patently unfair (fainress, n., one of those liberal notions!) not to give the residents of the targeted states a forum for saying "Not My State!"
Who wants to step up to the plate and buy/develop http://notmystate.org to provide a forum for residents of Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming? The ideal webmaster should hail from one of these states and be committed to free expression.
Republiterians should also be interested in hosting such a site. The state with the least amount of input may be the ideal state to hijack.
Lope - 07/10/03 09:32 AM
A series of thunderstorms moved through Southeastern Virginia Wednesday afternoon and disabled our cable internet access. We don't have land telephone service so I'm unable to post from home. I will add a few things from work today - so long as everyone promises not to tell my boss.
Right now, I'm going to call Cox and scream at them some more. It won't get me working any quicker but it does make me feel better.
Lope - 07/08/03 11:49 PM
The Free State Project is an effort by Libertarians to take over a small state and pass laws.. er repeal laws.. favoring Libertarian causes.. er targeting other folk's causes. It's so confusing!
So how do you join the movement, Dear Republiterian? All you have to do is cede your individual right to live where you want to, and let the Free State Project group choose a small state to which you will move. Once there, the group will instruct you on on how to vote and for whom to vote. If you are successful, you can have your individualism and liberty back. Moving costs are not refundable, in any case.
If the irony is lost on you, then you are an ideal candidate.
I'm not sure, but I think this is how D.C. got started..
Ravenwood - 07/08/03 09:15 PM
I just wanted to provide a brief "Blog Vacation" update. Believe me when I say it is no vacation. To give you an example of how my days are going, I'll give you a timeline of my day today.
I started off by arriving at work at 6:15 AM. I had to work for about an hour, doing some administration functions at work. I had to send out a fax that had been left on my desk, answer all my email and voice mail, and perform the daily maintenance on our network server. I had several documents to print out for my boss' meeting today, which he had to host without me. I managed to get all the important stuff done by 7:15, and then it was off to my MCSE boot camp.
Class started at 7:30 AM, and we had an exam first thing in the morning. I passed, and completed the first step toward my MCSE certification. Technically that makes me an MCP, but I'm not going to get too excited. I have 6 more exams to face over the next 12 days. After the exam, we had lecture and studied for the rest of the day. (And I do mean, the rest of the day.)
Class let out at 9 PM, which made for pretty much a 15 hour day. That doesn't include my home work. I have about an hour or two of reading to complete tonight, before I start the whole process over again tomorrow.
I have to keep this schedule up for two straight weeks. It started on Sunday, and goes through next Saturday, the 19th. The only breaks I get are on Saturday and Sunday when I don't have to go to work, and can concentrate just on my MCSE class. No, the boot camp doesn't give us any days off. (sigh)
As far as the web site goes, there is absolutely no way I could maintain the blog on top of all this. I think Lope is doing a great job running the site while I'm gone. His politics are just about polar opposites of mine, so I expect that all you people that were sending me hate mail on a daily basis will start sending lovey dovey notes now.
At the very least, please be sure to send thanks to Lope for holding down the fort while I'm away. (And no, Acidman didn't fire me and hire someone else. Don't believe a damn word he says.)
Lope - 07/08/03 04:46 PM
If you're like me, you're cheap and lazy and it becomes apparent every other week when its time to mow the damn yard. For years I've let the grass grow real high and never, ever raked. Science has caught up with me - turns out I'm an organic groundskeeper.
Paul Wheaton explains it all. While you're reading, I'll be out working on my mower. Really.
Lope - 07/08/03 11:24 AM
Below is the latest salvo in my war to make General Wesley Clark the Last Man Standing:
Top Ten Reasons Not To Vote Democrat
10. Ralph Nader
9. Joe Leiberman
8. Al Sharpton
7. John Edwards
6. Dick Gephart
5. Howard Dean
4. Carol Moseley-Braun
3. Bob Graham
2. Dennis Kucinich
1. John Kerry
Lope - 07/08/03 01:50 AM
In a last-ditch effort to attract America's military and financial aid, the Democratic Republic of Congo elected Saddam Hussein President yesterday. "We are confident that Saddam Hussein will be able to straighten out our country." winked outgoing President Joseph Kabila. He rushed on, "This monster will stop our people from killing one another so that we may begin the task of killing Americans." Afterwards, he quickly covered up his face with a handkerchief and coughed loudly while his chest shook.
After composing himself, Mr. Kabila said that while Saddam Hussein had not officially arrived in the country, his luggage had and "it smelled funny, like plutonium and anthrax mixed together in a horrendous dirty bomb destined to destroy the infidels of the world." He went on to say, "Regrettably, Congo Air lost the luggage but we suspect it is somewhere in northeast Congo, in the midst of the heaviest tribal genocide."
Mr. Kabila also announced the expulsion of all UN observers but had high praise for the exiting French. "We will miss the French people, and their staunch loyalty and delicious toast."
President Bush is expected to hold a news conference later today announcing troop movements to the central African region.
Lope - 07/07/03 11:40 PM
On the way home from work today, I passed a truck with this bumper sticker:
"There are Americans ... And there are Liberals"
At first I was pissed off. (I hate Super Patriots who question everyone else's patriotism, especially the Chicken Hawk crowd). I rolled down my window with the intention of saying something at the next light. But at the next light before we got side by side, he rolled down his own window and poured out his drink on the road. Then he flipped his cigarette out the window. Upon seeing this, I had to smile. Ever heard the quote "Consider the source?" We need more folks like this questioning other folk's patriotism.
Kinda reminds me of Ann Coulter and Mike Savage hyper-defining Conservatism to an all-new level of hysteria and silliness. These folks, of course, will be the undoing of the modern neo-con movement. Just give 'em more rope - (and make sure there are no lynchin' trees nearby.. !)
What I fear with the modern neo-con movement is that dissent will be silenced. This is one reason I've proudly self-identified as a liberal. Just for fun sometime, listen to Rush or Boortz or Coulter and everytime you hear the word "liberal", substitute it mentally with "Jew" or "Christian" or "Negro". Pick your favorites race, religion, or creed. Scary, huh? We need folks like Coulter and Savage and this litter pig giving the whole shooting match a black eye.
Lope - 07/07/03 06:32 PM
Those of you who give a damn noticed I haven't been posting much in the last week. We just signed a contract on this house:
We had planned on being homeless longer, since moving out of our old house. Our "old house" wasn't that old. We had it built in 1990 and it wasn't anything special, just a small A-frame house way out in the suburbs. Since then, everyone else in the world moved out there too and traffic became a special kind of nightmare that only those who have lived in Hampton Roads can understand. (I know traffic is bad in other places but you have options there.. it's all about optional routes!)
The new place is only about 3 miles from my work and 4 miles from her work. And 2 miles from the kid's babysitter. All going in the same direction.
Lope - 07/07/03 05:57 PM
Generally speaking, we self-identify as conservative or liberal. Doug Newman points out that no matter how we self-identify, our actions speak louder than our feelings. In We Are All Liberals Now, he makes an excellent sports analogy about the current state of politics:
"Recently, I said that politics should resemble football, with one team moving the ball toward one end zone, and the other team moving the ball toward the opposite end zone. Someone e-mailed me back saying that contemporary politics is more like baseball, with both teams working to advance across the same plate, but just earlier and more often."
If you like this quote, you'll love the full essay.
Lope - 07/05/03 01:54 PM
If you have Showtime, you probably already know about Family Business. If you don't have Showtime, maybe its time to spring for it. Family Business is the Porn Industry's version of The Courtship of Eddie's Father. The Reality TV show follows single parent Adam Glasser (aka Seymore Butts) as he struggles to meet a nice girl who accepts him and what he does for a living: distributor, producer, director and occasional star in the Adult Entertainment Industry.
Completing the cast are his eccentric older cousin Stevie and not-so-typical Jewish Mom, Lila. Together they help him run his business and provide comic relief and intimate insight, respectively.
My only complaint is some of the scenes with Stevie seem to be setups designed for comedy. For instance, when a camera-man/director is a no-show for a guy-girl-girl shoot, Stevie is sent over to film it, despite having no directing experience and knowledge of how to operate the camera (or even turn it on.) Still other scenes with Stevie are crying-fits funny, like when Adam has to leave the office early and tasks Stevie with interviewing and photographing a male model.
Still, despite hilarious scenes, the nude roller skating party for Stevie's 60th birthday party reminds us why we love the show!
Ravenwood - 07/05/03 01:00 PM
I don't know if this will help her climb out of the 825 spot, but I'm going to try.
Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl Dizzy-Girl
UPDATE: Speaking of linkage, it has now been about 6 months without Spoons.
Ravenwood - 07/04/03 09:00 AM
On July 4, 1776, American patriots signed the Declaration of Independence. The document was inflammatory, in that it accused the King of England of tyranny and heinous crimes against man. It could have spelled a death sentence for everyone who signed it. Yet, the document proved to be the framework for world wide freedom. It professed that man is "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights", and that "among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Hapiness."
Those are ideals worth fighting for, and worth dying for.
This is not just July 4th. This is not just a day to sit around the pool and bar-b-que. This is not just a day to sell new cars at 0% interest and $1000 cash back. This is not just a day to drink tall frosty beverages with your friends.
This day, is first and foremost, the anniversary of our Independence Day.
Ravenwood - 07/03/03 03:00 PM
For those of you starting your holiday early, have a happy Independence Day.
I don't know how much posting I'll do this long weekend. I don't plan on posting at all tomorrow, and I start a two-week class on Sunday, so I may not be back here for a while.
Lope will be filling in for me while I'm gone. Please be courteous to him, as he is quite new to weblogging and probably hasn't built up the immunity to hate mail like I have.
Ravenwood - 07/03/03 01:45 PM
Susan Reimer of the Baltimore Sun is griping about men not getting married early enough. Even though today's society isn't exactly promoting marriage, and many of today's feminazi liberal women don't really have much to offer, Reimer places the blame solely on men. While I disagree, I cannot help but laugh at some of her observations about young single guys.
He has no biological clock since he can father children well past middle age, so he is in no hurry to marry.Immature? Irresponsible? Self-absorbed? I'll give her self-absorbed, but is name-calling really a way to get guys to commit to marriage? I'm probably missing her point, but I think her griping does more to encourage men to stay single than anything else. Who the hell wants to put up with that crap when they don't have to?He is looking for a "soul-mate," and he believes there is someone out there whom he is destined to love.
If he finds her, he is also likely to find that the relationship does not live up to this romantic ideal, but it will be easy enough to divorce these days.
In the meantime, he is taking his time looking for her because he can, so his current lifestyle is likely to extend into his 30s.
He is living an extended adolescence - an adult-olescence - and every immature, irresponsible, self-absorbed thing he does is re-enforced by the latest issue of his favorite men's magazine.
Reimer goes on and on, blaming single men for fathering children out of wedlock, and for being openly suspicious man-trapping women. From the very title of her op-ed, "Grow up, men", she places full blame on sexually deviant single guys, who are just out there to have fun, and keep skirting through life with no responsibilities.
My view is CAN YOU BLAME THEM. To be perfectly frank, the so-called "problem" has mostly to do with today's loose women, who let men get away with it. For one thing, they aren't exactly pushing guys in the marriage direction. Since the sexual revolution women rarely save themselves for marriage anymore, and young women are all very quick to shack up with a guy; sometimes for years at a time. I don't want to use any cliches, but I'm thinking of one about a cow, and free milk.
I have nothing against marriage, and I certainly have nothing against easy women. What I do take issue with, however, is putting the blame solely on men. Whether feminists like it or not, women are the attractors of the species, and right now they simply aren't selling something men want to buy.
Maybe feminazis should stop teaching young women how to make it on their own, and start teaching them how to cook.
Ravenwood - 07/03/03 10:25 AM
California's budget woes are nothing new. After a low level functionary single-handedly decided to triple the state's car tax, the GOP legislators are filing suit. Of course, the government will continue to rake in the taxes until the matter has been fully litigated. What strikes me is how the California government and the employee's unions are still pushing through big dollar raises.
SACRAMENTO - As California entered the new fiscal year without a budget or any plan to climb out of its multibillion-dollar budget hole, Republican legislators went to court Tuesday to dismantle the tripling of the car tax ordered by the Davis administration and set to take effect in October.I don't know which is more damning, that California has a whopping 180,000 employees, or that Gray Davis (who has been quoted as saying "The problem is not spending, the problem is lack of revenue"), gave them all 7% raises that took effect this month.State employees, meanwhile, balked at the governor's plea for 180,000 of them to give back raises of up to 7% that were negotiated last year and take effect today. The workers have been warned that if they do not accept salary freezes of a year or longer, as many as 10,000 will be laid off.
In spite of having the biggest budget gap in the history, and despite a massive state wide recall effort, Gray Davis continues to raise spending. I think he needs psychiatric help. Gray Davis' has a long history of fiscal irresponsibility. For his first four years in office, Davis:
Ravenwood - 07/03/03 09:20 AM
I cannot blame Hormel for being upset that the name of their popular canned lunch meat has been transformed into describing the repugnant bulk e-mail that clogs our inboxes every day. The fact that they are going after an anti-spam utility called Spam Arrest in court seems to be perfectly justifiable. The problem for Hormel, is trademark law probably isn't on their side.
The company added that Spam Arrest's name so closely resembles that of its lunchmeat that the public might become confused, or might think that Hormel endorses Spam Arrest's products.Perhaps our friends in legal circles can weigh in here. As I've always understood the law, a trademark infringement usually has to stem from confusion between the two products. When two companies make completely different products, they are allowed to share similar trademarks. That means that Hormel needs to make the case that someone might accidentally purchase the Spam Arrest e-mail blocking software, thinking that they are purchasing canned meat.
Trademark law seems to be somewhat forgiving in this respect. For instance General Motors and General Mills, both have similar names and initials, but make completely different products. CBS, who owned The Nashville Network (now the National Network, wants to be SpikeTV) sued The Network Network (TNN) for trademark infringement to get the rights to their domain name, TNN.com Their claim was pretty weak, given the fact that TNN had been around longer than The Nashville Network, and that TNN.com sold network maintenance and other IT related services. In his ruling, the judge comically wrote:
Unlikely indeed is the hapless Internet searcher who, unable to find information on the schedule of upcoming NASCAR broadcasts or 'Dukes of Hazzard' reruns, decided to give up and purchase a computer network maintenance seminar instead.Being that the two businesses were sufficiently different, CBS lost their case, and faced a motion for attorney's fees from the defendant. I'm afraid Hormel will face the same uphill battle that CBS faced.
Ravenwood - 07/03/03 09:00 AM
There is something interesting going on in Nevada.
Gov. Kenny Guinn [a Republican] asked the Nevada Supreme Court on Tuesday to order the Legislature to raise taxes after lawmakers failed to fund a new public schools budget.I guess after seeing the SCOTUS circumvent the state legislative process, he wants to see if he can do the same with his own supreme court. If that doesn't work, perhaps he can get Sandra Day O'Conner to rule that the Nevada legislature has a "compelling interest" to raise taxes.Guinn made the request as the new fiscal year opened without legislative approval of $864 million in new taxes or a K-12 schools budget.
Ravenwood - 07/02/03 06:00 PM
Wow. I cracked the 300 barrier on the Truth Laid Bear Ecosystem, and am hanging on to position number 299. Since there are over 3000 registered weblogs in the ecosystem, does this mean that I am Top 10%?
Well, regardless of what it means, I am ranked higher than Ann Coulter's Coultergeist. Of course, she hasn't started posting entries yet. All she'd have to do is post a nudie pic of herself, and she'd probably shoot up to the Top 10.
I don't have any Ann Coulter nudy pics, but I did post these way back in July, 2002.
Ravenwood - 07/02/03 01:45 PM
After reading a few of the comments on Peppermint Patty's site, I wanted to try to dispel some of the myths about Cuban cigars. Cuban cigars like Cohiba, Montecristo, and Romeo y Julieta are not the same cigars as their Dominican and Nicaraguan cousins. When Fidel Castro took over Cuba in 1959, one of the first things he did was seize the local tobacco factories for the government. Owners of the factories fled Cuba and took with them, the knowledge, the processes, and sometimes even the seed used to grow their world famous tobacco.
Many of them set up shop the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, Mexico, and other various countries, to start rebuilding their business. With court approval, they even held on to their trademarks, which explains why there is a Cuban Montecristo and a Dominican Montecristo. They are not the same cigars, and the only thing they share is the name and sometimes the look of the band. Before the manufacturers had court approval to continue to use their former trademarks, many cigar manufacturers tried to re-establish brand names, and thus cigars like Montecruz were born.
Although Castro seized control over the Cuban cigar factories, the commie variants that he produces there now are in no way as good as pre-1959 Cuban cigars. They may be decent smokes, but the Dominican, and Nicaraguan sticks typically rival or exceed them in quality and taste. Much of the appeal for Cuban cigars in today's society stems from the U.S. embargo of all things Cuban. People assume that since they cannot have them, they must be good. With the high demand, Castro's factories have focused more on quantity and market saturization than on quality. While Cigar Aficionado noted that Cuba is starting to focus more on quality as of late, they still have a long way to go.
Not only is their quality usually substandard, but Cuban cigars demand a premium. Cubans that you buy in Canada and Europe are usually much more expensive than similar non-Cuban cigars. Not only do they cost more, but by buying Habana-made sticks, your money is supporting a communist dictatorial regime. Now, I'd be a pretty big hypocrit if I stood on my soap box and preached against smoking Cuban cigars solely on that basis, mainly because I've bought more than my fair share of them. However, I will say that outside of the prestige of having something that you aren't supposed to have, or something that nobody else can get, Cuban cigars are typically a mediocre smoke, and not worth the money.
Naturally, some Cuban varieties are a better than others. I found the Montecristo #4s, and Romeo y Julieta Excepcionales to be an excellent cigar. But when you factor in the price, you can get a much better Dominican smoke, and you don't need to travel overseas or break the law to do it.
Another problem with Cuban cigars is that there is a huge market for counterfeits. If you are buying them on the streets of Havana, they are likely to be a counterfeit label wrapped around some skunk weed. The same goes for flea markets. I saw some at a gun show a few months back that were obvious counterfeits. Aside from the label being completely wrong, the cigars themselves looked like they'd been run through a washing machine. The only thing that did look genuine was the box, but even then I didn't get a close enough look to see if the tax stamp was real or not. (To be honest, I didn't really care.)
If you are a cigar lover whose never had one from Habana, next time you are out of the U.S. you might want to try one. I certainly wouldn't blame anyone for wanting to sample something they've never had before. I'm just saying that you should beware that it may not be all that you were expecting.
Related articles:
Priming your Humidor -- 06/24/2003
A Fine Cigar -- 06/15/2003
Guns and Cigars -- 12/18/2002
Cigars are an obsession -- 10/16/2002
Ravenwood - 07/02/03 10:30 AM
Am I the only one concerned about this technology? I can see England jumping on this product right away. Some local lawmakers of cities in the U.S. probably won't be too far behind.
WASHINGTON - The Pentagon is developing an urban surveillance system that would use computers and thousands of cameras to track, record and analyze the movement of every vehicle in a foreign city.It sounds like just another big step toward the Orwellian nightmare to me.
Related articles:
It's 1984 in Oregon - 06/03/2003
Ravenwood - 07/02/03 08:25 AM
Site traffic increased in June. Here are some raw numbers according to Webalizer: 12513 visitors (11583 last month), 31117 page views (26640 last month), 448649 hits (374537 last month), and 3.82 GB (3.07 last month).
The Ravnwood.com page counter also went over 85,000 last month, with very little fanfare.
There were 169 posts in June, compared to 140 in May, 127 in April, 123 in March. The high is still 186 in November, 2002.
Ravenwood - 07/02/03 08:15 AM
We must have come around the batting order, because Laurence Simon is hosting the Carnival again. Head on over to Amish Tech Support to check it out.
Ravenwood - 07/01/03 06:48 PM
Ravenwood - 07/01/03 06:30 PM
Ravenwood - 07/01/03 01:45 PM
Apparently I'm not reading very influential weblogs. I read #8 and #9 on this list, and that's it. Every now and then I catch an article from one of the others, but they are few and far between.
I'm also not sure what they mean by influence. To me, influence means the shaping of minds. To influence someone, they not only need to have someone's ear, but also their respect. After all, just because you agree with someone's point of view, doesn't necessarily mean that they have an influence over you. I may read someone's work, and agree with 70% of it. But do they really have an influence on me? Are they influencing me to agree with their point of view, or would I have come to that conclusion on my own? Methinks the latter is probably true.
I don't want to name too many names, but when it comes to influence, I would pick a person like Walter Williams. I love his work, and am truly influenced by it. I think it shows up in my writing. From the blogosphere, I would say Kim DuToit has a lot of influence over me. When it comes to guns, he seems to be a tall dog in the knowledge department. I'm no slouch myself, but when I need clarity on something, Kim is usually one of the ones I turn to.
Ravenwood - 07/01/03 01:15 PM
Virginia HB1516 goes into effect today. That is a preemption bill for carrying concealed handguns in the Commonwealth. Even after today, several localities still have laws on the books banning the carrying of concealed firearms in local parks and various other public places. The new Virginia law says that they can keep their silly laws on the books if they want to, but they cannot enforce them. It is part of a statewide effort to make uniform, the places a person can and cannot carry a concealed handgun. It should go a long way to removing some of the confusion for permit holders.
For information on places that permit holders can carry in Virginia, I suggest you check out Packing.org, or the VCDL web site.
Ravenwood - 07/01/03 11:10 AM
Ravenwood - 07/01/03 10:15 AM
The Canadian Navy is "worn out" and taking a year off. How can they afford to do that? Aren't they afraid of invasion? Who will protect them?
It must be nice to have the luxury of unwavering American protection. Even though they didn't support us in Iraq, they still depend on us to keep them safe. Is there any chance that we'd just look the other way if someone like Russia, Greenland, or the Rhode Island National Guard just up and decided to conquer Canada?
Ravenwood - 07/01/03 09:45 AM
The unemployment rate in Euro-zone nations is stagnating at close to 9%, reports the AP.
BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) - Unemployment in the 12 nations that share the euro as their currency remained at 8.8 percent in May, its highest level in three years, the European Union statistics agency Eurostat said Tuesday.Despite their high taxes, balanced budgets, and generous social programs, Europe continues to have unemployment. France, who caps the number of hours a person can work each week to 35, has an unemployment rate of over 9%. Go figure?The jobless rate in the euro-zone's largest economies in Germany and France, stood at 9.4 percent and 9.1 percent respectively, while the highest rate was registered by Spain, where unemployment stood at 11.3 percent.
(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014